Northwestern 48, Purdue 26: An Overview
With Northwestern leading 27-12 in the third quarter, the Wildcats decided to quit toying with Purdue and effectively end the game. With Purdue backed up in a 2nd and 12, Quentin Davie sacked Curtis Painter to force a third and long. On the next play, DE Corey Wootton spun inside and pancaked Painter, forcing a wounded duck that was picked off. Three plays later, Bacher notched his third TD pass on a route where the Wildcats flooded the right side with three wide receivers, a perfect play call on first and goal on the 1. Game over, flip flip flip.
These five or so plays can tell you anything you need to know about Northwestern's dominance over Purdue. The Wildcat offense ran their various offensive sets soundly, with a mix of quarterback draws, inside hand offs, and of course the bread and butter precision passing. The Wildcat offense was led by an efficient passing day from Bacher (who showed great elusiveness and even ran for 40 yards) and a "Game Ball" performance by the offensive line. Here's what Lake the Posts, a NW blogger, said about the Wildcat O-Line:
Our OL was the "giant question mark" heading into the season as we are very inexperienced with both RS Fr and people in new positions. However, we're top 10 in the nation in least sacks allowed and have given amazing pass protection. Our interior ability to create seams for Sutton has been the weak link. (Their performance has been) overwhelmingly positive so far this year...
Talking about the offensive line isn't sexy, but the NW O-Line was so dominant that it needs to discussed. Two frosh, Ben Burkett and TE Cameron Joplin, made key downfield blocks on screen passes; the Wildcats screened all day and on every down. If NW can keep this offensive efficiency going, games against Minnesota and Illinois will be even more winnable. Weaknesses? Well, until Peterman somehow broke free for a long touchdown on a screen pass, the commentators were sort of making fun of the NW receiving corps. They didn't go so far as comparing them to intramural players, but instead said things like "boy it would be nice if the receivers could break tackles." And they have a point; the receivers are supposed to essentially catch three yard passes and dive forward - these aren't exactly five star recruits. (I don't think? LTP help).
Purdue: Sheets broke a long one for a touch and found holes in the middle all day. Painter looked out of sync, but he does lack playmakers at WR, or even people who can catch the ball 80% of the time. The Purdue "basketball on grass" has evolved into the "whip a bullet at a wide receiver four yards away and watch the ball glance off his hands for a pick." The Boilermaker's winless Big 10 season is probably harder to take for the West Lafayette fans because unlike their losing counterparts in Ann Arbor, this team had expectations.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It cannot be said enough...
…NU’s O-Line has played spectacular football despite being a young, relatively inexperienced group.
The scariest part (for the Big Ten, anyways)? Most of them are freshmen/red-shirt freshmen, and they have some really highly-ranked recruits coming in for O-Line, too….in other words, that O-Line might be a huge advantage for some time at NU. They’ll have a tough time replacing Bacher/Sutton/Peterman/Ward/Conteh at the skill positions, but the new QB will have time to throw, and the RB should have holes to run thru….
And, thankfully, the newly formidable (or at least respectable) NU defense is also fairly young, and should continue their strong play….
GO CATS!
Painter's...
….been out of sync all season. Orton and Hardy are playmakers, they just can’t get the ball in their hands. And, save for a couple drops this day, the WR core hasn’t had many drops all season. What they lack is the talent/size to be able to break off from the defensive backs at the line of scrimmage. And a QB who can actually get them the ball.
Thanks for the wild ride, Cubbies, but, in the end, I'm feeling nothing but nausea...
Carmen...
We deserve a nice overview of Purdue’s year so far…I know Painter is bad and the linebacker’s havent been solid, but whats the future of this season and how will the Boilers regroup? Any big time recruits coming in? Will the system change with Tiller’s retirement?
by Graham Filler on Oct 23, 2008 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions
In a nutshell....
…this is a team that has lost its way. After giving Oregon all it could handle, the team has struggled in nearly every game since to put points on the board. A lot of that has to do with the QB and the inexperience of the WR group as a whole. A lot of complaints on the “vanilla” offensive play calls as well.
The future of the rest of the season is bleak. We’ll be underdogs in most every game here on out……save maybe Michigan and IU. Sheets has been “muzzled” from the press the rest of the year by Tiller for basically calling out the rest of the offense. “I can’t do it all myself”. But he’s seriously the only one out there on offense that looks like he gives a damn.
A couple of decent recruits for the defense next year from the state of Georgia (DT Eric McDaniel and LB Shayon Green), but nothing else to truly write home about. Recruiting has been widely criticized that past few years….for lack of talent and/or lack of character…and next year’s class again looks weak, unless Danny Hope can do some last minute miracle work.
Not sure if you’ll see much of a change in philosophy next year unless we HAVE to with the level of talent. Hope will be more involved and more intense, which Tiller has not been the last 5 years. We’ll have 7/11 back on defense, only 5/11 on offense. If this year has helped anything, it’s been getting some FR out there to get some experience. (Golding and Carlino will develop into good LB’s some day and Bolden looks like he could be a talent at RB).
QB next year will probably be Elliot, unless Hope decides on more of an option attack with Siller instead. Even though I’m not a big Painter fan, the talent level will go down at that position.
Next year looks about as sorry as this year, unless we get some talent at WR (we lose our top 2 WR after this year). Jaceyn Taylor coming back at RB will give us a strong running game.
It will be interesting to see what Hope does with this coaching staff. Many think the OC is gone, and many have called for Spack’s head the last 3 years. Does Hope start with a clean slate next year or do we get more of the same vanilla offense and bend don’t break defense we’ve suffered through this year? Not sure.
Thanks for the wild ride, Cubbies, but, in the end, I'm feeling nothing but nausea...

by 















