Insight Bowl: A Quick History
They say that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. So what exactly does that say about the Minnesota Gophers football squad returning to the Insight Bowl for the third time in four years?
We'll get to that another time. As for today, what is the history of this bowl?

The Insight Bowl is the third incarnation of the name of the bowl that started out as the Copper Bowl in 1989, then changed to the Insight.com Bowl in 1996 when Insight Enterprises took over the naming rights. The game has been called the Insight Bowl since 2002.
The Big Ten got involved with the Insight Bowl in 2006 when the game began to feature a match-up between our beloved conference and a Big 12 school. That, of course, was the year Texas Tech staged the biggest comeback in Division I bowl history, coming back from a 38-7 deficit mid-way through the 3rd quarter. That utter collapse also proved to be the final straw in Glen Mason's undoing as head of the Gophers.
In the three year history of the Big Ten v Big 12 match-up in the Insight Bowl, the Big Ten is 0-3, with Minnesota accounting for two of those losses (2006 v Texas Tech, 2008 v Kansas). The other was an Indiana loss in 2007 to Oklahoma State.
The reality of the situation is that, outside of the first two and a half quarters of the 2006 Minnesota v Texas Tech Insight Bowl, the Big Ten has not been competitive in this game.
Gopher fans and Big Ten fans alike can agree on one thing, that needs to change this year.
16 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank goodness we’ll have Brewster for that game, as he shot down all of those pesky Kansas rumors. Gee Tim, we don’t have any idea how those got started either! Couldn’t have been your people contacting Kansas to drum up interest? Hard to believe KU wasn’t interested in a guy with a 6-18 Big Ten record, o-fer November against Big Ten teams, and an o-fer-nine in trophy games. I would think any school would be lucky to have a coach like that! I know we are!
Had Danny Hope not called that dumb timeout at the end of the Notre Dame game, Purdue would have been the Big Ten’s rep in this game- or they probably would have even bumped Michigan State down to this one.
ugh
I just don’t know what Minnesota brings to the table this Holiday season. Maybe some defensive toughness?
by Graham Filler on Dec 10, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions
Don't forget an abundance of
exclamation GOPHER FIGHT FOOTBALL WIN TRY points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
This bowl is a Hawkeye fan's worst nightmare
I’m putting my Chizik Nickel on a Russian nuke ending this for us all.
If either team wins this game, so do the terrorists.
I disagree
Watching these two teams flop around in flaccid failure is exactly what what every Hawkeye fan should love.
http://www.rivalryesq.com/
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Bama Hawkeye on Dec 10, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions
It's just that...one of them has to win
If college football had ties, I’d be all for a 0-0 or 2-2 tie, But if one of them has to win, I vote nuke.
Oh good...
I was worried that we weren’t going to get any snide remarks from the Hawkeye fans.
"Don't you want a little taste of the glory... see what it tastes like?"
Jerdogg
What’s the Brewster scheme going to be against the Cyclones? 40 pass attempts again? Maybe some Gray?
Word has it...
that you’ll see a significant dose of Gray… at WR.
"Don't you want a little taste of the glory... see what it tastes like?"
Well, at least playing outside won't be a distraction
"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."
--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by 
















