Texas Tech v MSU in the Alamo Bowl: Do past bowl results tell us anything about this game?
I am hardly excited about this match-up, as everyone can explain what exactly Michigan State needs to do for a chance at winning, but no one can explain how exactly this is going to happen. Everyone and their mother knows Michigan State can't defend the pass and that defensive coordinator Pat Narduzzi refuses to play anything other than two ineffective schemes. Everyone also knows that the magic of the Texas Tech attack comes from the Air Raid principles of Mike Leach, which includes an amalgamation of shallow crossing routes, comeback routes, dumpoffs in space, and quick screens.
Here is the numbers breakdown from The Only Colors, of course highlighting the fact that TT has the #2 passing offense in the nation and MSU has the #103 pass defense.
But let's save the scheming and gnashing of Spartan teeth for another day and discuss some past bowl games results. Could this game be closer than everyone believes?
How do the Spartans look in bowl games and what does this say about the 2010 Alamo Bowl? MSU is currently on a 3 game bowl losing streak: '03 to Nebraska, '07 to BC and '08 to Georgia. The Georgia game was a decent indicator - MSU played tough against the run and kept the game close until it became apparent that Brian Hoyer wasn't going to be able lead the Spartans to victory through the air with Ringer bottled up. MSU even led at the half, 6-3. So essentially, they were who everyone thought they were, a solid defense with not enough offense.
How do the Red Raiders look in bowl games and what does this say about the 2010 Alamo Bowl? A 10-21-1 bowl record doesn't diminish the fact that Texas Tech has been bowling consistently for two decades, competing in 16 bowl games in the last 25 years. However, the last three years give excellent indication of what happens come Holiday time to Leach's Raiders.
|
30 |
W |
12-29-2006 |
44 |
Minnesota |
41 |
Insight Bowl |
|
31 |
W |
01-01-2008 |
31 |
Virginia |
28 |
Gator Bowl |
|
32 |
L |
01-02-2009 |
34 |
Mississippi |
47 |
Cotton Bowl |
No shortage of points, but not exactly stingy defense either. Don't forget that the 2008 version featured Graham Harrell and Mike Crabtree, but Ole Miss put a lickin' on 'em anyways.
Now I understand perfectly that football games exist in a vacuum and that some TT defensive back isn't going to be thinking about an '06 performance while on the field. This is a brand new matchup with new players at key positions (no Otis Wiley, Crabtree, Ringer, Harrell). But I've decided that, in the spirit of the holidays, each Alamo Bowl post will have some form of optimistic Spartan bent to it. It's not propaganda, more like inspiration for all those Sparties depressed about the 10 suspended players, no running back depth, and a matchup from hell with Leach's minions.
So let me say this: Texas Tech's offensive makes them seem like an unattractive bowl match-up, including last year when only 1 out of 12 OPC contestants picked Ole Miss over TT. This is perfectly understandable, especially when one sees the Air Raid scenario's and plays like the one below. How is my team going to prepare for this in one month, you ask, and do we really have the horses to stop a team scoring almost 40 points a game? Well for the last three years, medium-level programs from the ACC, SEC, and Big Ten have held their own against Texas Tech. So don't lose all hope yet Spartans.

3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You Sir are Go##$ Da*&% genius!
I think you are exactly on target. Texas Tech- in 2009 is neither as ferocious “a scoring machine” nor is MSU as inept as the record would appear. Tech is a notorious after the "break" slow starter. Mainly because IMO they are a rhythm team. The hope is this year the coaching staff has recognized this trend and addressed it. HC Leach put them in pads on Sunday after the Baylor dog fight in Jerry World. Seemingly to prove a point. Red raider fans are eager to see another bowl demon – the Alamo Bowl – slain, put to rest – or exorcised in a great party city. The assistant head coach Ruffin McNeill has publicly stated they are going to do the public affairs stuff as required but they "are primarily there to win a football game. All the Red raider faithful are ready to take them at their word – especially after being bombarded in the Cotton Bowl by hottie toddie fans chanting "over rated" in the Cotton Bowl. Here’s to starting a nice conversation on this theme grahmfiller10.
"do routine things routinely"
love those hottie tottie fans...
I really truly want to know what MSU will do to scheme against the Air Raid…But I agree with you, TT is all about rhythm and if the rhythm is good for the Alamo, Vegas’ 8 point spread is going to be awfully low…
Bowl Match ups in particular are based on preparation time
First I am not buying the woe is me stuff from Coach Dantonio. His 2nd string folks are good enough for Div 1 football and that’s really all any opposing coordinator should consider. They all run 4.3 – 4.5 40 yards and weigh in over 200 lbs bench press 300lbs. That’s just a given. We had many pre season prognosticators say – "well the Raiders lost their 2 x studs at Def End so they cannot replace the sacks the generated in 2008" . BS. The 2nd & 3rd string dudes stepped up and nearly doubled the 22 sack output of the departed M. Dixon and B. Williams. Its Big 10 football and I don’t think the Spartans will drop one jot in effort. I ‘d expect a run heavy attack with lots of trap blocks and a bit of spread to open the middle for MSU QB Cousins to run QB draws. Notice the brain surgeons of football the MSU offensive linemen did not get into trouble fighting with smart ass fraternity wimps. So his O line is intact and the y will give every Tech def linemen a good fight for 60 minutes. The best example of a similar team is the 06 Golden Gophers which you folks know very well. On the tech side they allowed 30 sacks. 4 times the # allowed in 2008. The closes thing to an MSU style team we have faced this year is Nebraska or maybe Okla. State U. And quite honestly if NU RB Roy Helu and his cohort from Plano RB Burkhead (an old nemesis of mine) hadn’t been a. nicked up and b . injured I think the Tech defense would have had a much longer day. The MSU QB has thrown for over 2500 (+) yards this season so its a given he’s fairly accurate.
On the Tech Offense side the thing which hasn’t panned out is a 1000 yard rusher. We have had some good rushing events then Leach has gone away from it for 3 – 4 quarters much to our detriment.
Got break off for few minutes more to follow tomorrow. Below is what I wrote a few weeks ago on DTN blog about the Bowl or bye weeks down periods versus practice tiem.
I.e. the raiders have a silly weak link in the team prep statistic or put another way a tendency. They lose the edge by breaking the preparation discipline. The opposition plays a big role they are preparing to halt our preferred play selection but it’s deeper than that. In that the Raiders show up sloppy for the first half of a game which has any aberration, any change or any disruption in the practice rhythm. I don’t know maybe it’s too much time off or some such distraction. Seem to throws the practice and preparation rhythm out of joint. Examples include the 06 Cotton bowl, 07 Colorado, 08 Gator bowl, the afore mentioned thrashing in Norman 08. – Late season note the Raiders didn’t look real great against OSU in 09 after a bye week. (sad face)
"do routine things routinely"
by centexraider on Dec 12, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions

by 
















