Leaders and Legends - The Big Ten Just Made a Big Mistake
As one of my favorite law professors used to say: keep it simple stupid. Apparently the Big Ten missed the memo.
After overseeing a brilliant twelve month campaign that saw the Big Ten expand from eleven to twelve teams, divide into divisions, and schedule a much overdue championship game, Commissioner Jim Delaney ended his administrative onslaught with a thud.
At least that's how I view the league's new brand identity that was unveiled yesterday afternoon on the Big Ten Network.
The three part portfolio consisted of 1. A new mark (logo), 2. Permanent names for the pre-existing divisions, and 3. Eighteen new football trophies.
My first look at the new logo was a low-resolution glance on a smartphone. Graham and I happened to be having lunch in Baltimore and we passed the phone back and forth exchanging bewildered looks. The thing that first struck me was the color change -- from royal to deep sky blue. As any reader of the site knows, I'm not a fan of inserting color for color's sake into a mark, and Pentagram Design's adaption felt a bit too whimsical for major college football's oldest brand.
Similarly, I had a hard time adjusting to the new logo's shape. The tiered, soft-rounded characters had an almost cartoonish quality. We just became Twitter, I thought to myself.
Still, I have to admit that after a few hours, the new logo is growing on me. I like the variations the conference unveiled -- particularly the B10 shorthand.
In the end I'll take the Big Ten's retro reimagination over the Pac-12's Voltron Shield, although I would have gone with a simple black and white design. Ultimately, I think Delaney is right that "marks grow and take on meaning, based on memories and emotions over time," so I'm willing to give the new logo a chance.
Not so much on division names. Legends and Leaders is bad. ACC Atlantic and Coastal bad. Actually, worse. Commentators have expressed a number of reasons the conference "overthought" its assignment. None are as damning as the fact that the new division names are indecipherable to the casual fan.
My Mom doesn't know the Big 12 Divisions from Adam, but if you ask her which one (North or South) Baylor is in, she'll guess correctly based on geographic intuition. Not only are Legends and Leaders abstract, they're phonically similar, making them impossible to untangle.
I can picture this statement being uttered at bars across the country next year: "Wait, are they in the Legends or Leaders division?"
It was a year of energizing administrative moments, but alas, the other shoe has dropped. Although the corpus of Big Ten expansion is still strong, its face is lame.
Tell the Big Ten to stick with East and West Divisions by writing or calling the league office:
1500 West Higgins Road
Park Ridge, IL 60068-6300
(847) 696-1010.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I just don't understand why they needed a marketing firm.
Was North/South too difficult? I understand that Wisconsin makes a clear N/S split not exactly spot on, but it’s close enough. I could deal with other conference fans saying “Wisconsin’s in the South Division!! Big Ten iz stoopid!” more than I can deal with the barrage of insults about to fly our way. Even Southeast/Northwest would have been better. Hell, Hogan/Undertaker would have been better than this.

@EpicTripod
SBN - Pittsburgh
Success With Honor
That image made a mistake with Purdue's protected rival
Purdue’s most hated rival is Iowa, not MSU.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Lakes and Plains
Sounds so….Big Tenish. I love it.
Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!
by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 14, 2010 7:57 AM CST reply actions
Wisconsin fits that no matter how you put them
Great Plains AND Great Lakes (Michigan and Superior)
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
You'll notice NCAA has no letter for the incompetence within...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 14, 2010 8:41 AM CST up reply actions
But
It would be a geography fail worse than the slightly off North/South or East/West.
Option 1
Lakes – Penn State, Ohio State, Indiana, Purdue, Illinois, Wisconsin
Plains – Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State
Problems: Michigan borders 4 of the 5 Great Lakes, and is called the freakin’ Great Lakes State. Northwestern is the most urban campus in the conference… a beautiful lakefront campus. (Two of them, in fact, with the medical and law schools in Chicago also being basically on the lake.)
Option 2
Lakes – Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State
Plains – Penn State, Ohio State, Indiana, Purdue, Illinois, Wisconsin
Problems: Nebraska and Iowa are the states represented that don’t border a Great Lake, while every state in the other division does.
I absolutely love the Lakes/Plains name, but that branding just doesn’t work for these divisions.
FIRE DELANEY
Wait, what?
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
You'll notice NCAA has no letter for the incompetence within...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 14, 2010 7:48 PM CST up reply actions
I still would have preferred East (PSU, UM, MSU, PU, IU, OSU) and West (Neb, NU, Iowa, Minn, UW, Illnois). I still think that aiming for competitive balance is a waste.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
by PurdueMatt on Dec 14, 2010 8:05 AM CST reply actions 4 recs
Absolutely.
Two existing protected rivalries get broken (Illinois-Indiana and NW-Purdue), which is the absolute minimum for any possible alignment. The final two weeks can always be division games without screwing with last-week rivalries (which should be Minn-Wisc, Iowa-Neb, Ill-NW, Ind-Pur, MSU-PSU, Mich-OSU). And you have divisions that will always make sense (as opposed to watching the balance shift and leaving you with completely nonsensical divisions) and names that won’t make you a damn laughingstock.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
by SpartanDan on Dec 14, 2010 9:43 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Lakes and Plains makes no sense.
Either you stick the Michigan schools in the Plains division with Nebraska and Iowa despite Michigan being “The Great Lakes State” or you put the two states most synonymous with plains in the Lakes division.
Legends and Leaders is horrible not just because of the similarity of the two names, but because it paints one division (Legends) as being stuck in the past and the other (Leaders) being the future of the conference.
East and West is the simplest and therefore best compromise.
That is sooooo not funny - Maize N Brew Dave
by jeepnut on Dec 14, 2010 8:28 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.
Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Jonathan Franz on Dec 14, 2010 8:41 AM CST up reply actions
Not mention
that it says that Indiana is a leader and Iowa is a legend, among others. It’s just dumb
It never gets to be easy.
Why the fuck doesn't it ever get to be easy?
by chitownhawkeye on Dec 14, 2010 11:40 AM CST up reply actions
Yup
The Michigan schools are a big problem for the Lakes/Plains thing, as is Northwestern. If Nebraska and Iowa constitute Plains, then they drag Northwestern into the Plains division too… the most urban campus in the conference and the only one that’s on a Great Lake would somehow not be in the Lakes division.
I love the Lakes/Plains name, but with the current divisional split, it makes zero sense. Not a viable option.
I'm almost leaning N/S rather than E/W
Wisconsin’s the only major outlier that way, whereas E/W both Michigan schools look out of place.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
Tim Brewster voted in this poll, I see...
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
You'll notice NCAA has no letter for the incompetence within...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 14, 2010 8:40 AM CST reply actions
someone at TDG
just mentioned why not use the Stagg and Griffith divisions instead.
Why not name the divisions after two greats NOT associated with any school? This wouldn’t piss anyone off….
Alonzo Stagg is a legendary coach at University of Chicago with his name on the championship trophy.
John L. Griffith was the first commissioner of the Big Ten, from 1922-1944.
Why not the Griffith and Stagg divisions?
by hapshaughnessy on Dec 14, 2010 7:14 AM CST reply actions
Can I second that motion?
No one is getting Rubio's rights unless they pry them from our cold dead fingers.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 14, 2010 9:01 AM CST reply actions
It would piss me off if we used Stagg Griffith
I don’t know why we would want to go out of the way to honor a school that isn’t even in the Big Ten. I understand the tradition aspect, but that move would just be way too “politically correct” and also no one nationally (or probably regionally) knows Stagg/Griffith from Abbot/Costello.
If we were going to honor old coaches we should have just done “Bo” and “Woody”. By using division names that look the same, and have essentially the same meaning, it all but guarantees people will only say “The one with Michigan” and “The one with Ohio State” anyway. I don’t like this, but it would be better than Stagg/Griffith or Legends/Leaders.
Or
“sixty” and “nine”
It fits the “can’t count” theme as well as accurately representing the geographical layout of the divisions.
Brunettes not fighter jets
by rockyh on Dec 14, 2010 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
heh
you said layout. :)
No one is getting Rubio's rights unless they pry them from our cold dead fingers.
by TheEvilProfessor on Dec 14, 2010 3:14 PM CST up reply actions
Leaders?
Can’t believe I haven’t read this anywhere: so Ohio State is in the Leaders division?
As in the UM fight song: “Leaders [sic] and best [sic]”?
That’s just wrong. Put Michigan in the “Eleven Warriors” division, maybe, and I’ll be content.
My 20/20 Hindsight Says...
They should have flipped Iowa and Wisconsin to maintain competitive balance and still be able to use North and South.
by truemichiganman on Dec 14, 2010 10:20 PM CST reply actions
Ideas, from "The Name Game", a Thread about this on Bring On The Cats...
Big Twelve
"Texas" and "Teams Who Beat Texas"
Sorry Nebraska, but there’s no room for you in either division.
by Gaknar on Dec 13, 2010 8:20 PM CST reply actions 14 recs
B10: “Teams Cursed with Road Trips to Minnesota in November” and “Teams Cursed with Road Trips to Michigan Whenever”
by Panjandrum on Dec 13, 2010 8:36 PM CST reply actions
B10: snow and ice
by Anon_the_younger on Dec 13, 2010 8:39 PM CST up reply actions
B 10:
"academics first" and "follow the money"
by bored? ya, me too on Dec 14, 2010 1:26 PM CST reply actions
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
You'll notice NCAA has no letter for the incompetence within...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 16, 2010 1:42 AM CST reply actions

by 































