2010 Sugar Bowl - Buckeyes Aim to Run, Run as Fast as They Can

48069_alabama_ingrams_heisman_chance_football_medium

You've heard the meme.  The 2010 edition of the Sugar Bowl is all about strength versus strength.  Fire versus ice.  Just like this year's Rose Bowl -- and last year's Rose Bowl for that matter -- when Ohio State and Arkansas take the field on January 4th the nation will wait to see whether the Razorback's potent passing offense (3rd nationally) or Buckeyes' denaturing defense (2nd nationally) is the last man standing.

But what if the answer actually lies on the other side of the ball, where a laconic scarlet attack lines up against an overlooked Razorback defense?  Buckeye fans are bullish about the team's ability to run all over Willy Robinson's 68th ranked rushing defense -- which measures in the bottom half of rushing defenses the Bucks faced in the Big Ten.  Arkansas apologists are quick to counter that the Hogs faced a more demanding slate of rushing attacks in SEC play, hence they gave up more yards.

But that's not entirely true.

Arkansas faced three Top 20 rushing attacks (Auburn, Mississippi, and Mississippi State) in 2010 and Ohio State played five teams (Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Purdue, and Marshall) with higher ranked rushing defenses than the Razorbacks.  Of those five teams:

Purdue faced four Top 20 rushing attacks (Ohio State, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan)

Iowa faced three Top 20 rushing attacks (Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio State).

Illinois and Wisconsin faced two Top 20 rushing attacks (Ohio State, Michigan)

Marshall faced one Top 20 rushing attack (Ohio State).

So, there's not a ton of evidence (on paper at least) that Arkansas' defense played tougher rushing offenses than Ohio State's opponents.  That means, with the exception of Marshall, it's fair to assume that Ohio State saw four defenses that were at least as good (and probably better) at stopping the run than Arkansas is.

So how did Ohio State's rushing attack fare against these defenses?  The Buckeyes averaged 177.5 yards a game (4.25 yards per carry) against Purdue, Iowa, Illinois, and Wisconsin.  That's less than their general season average 219.6 yards a game (5.25 yards per carry), but not by much.

In other words, there's nothing in the numbers that suggests Jim Tressel will deviate from his bread and butter offensive gameplan.  But what about the individual matchups themselves?

The games that standout when you look at Arkansas on film are their losses to Alabama and Auburn, where the Razorbacks allowed a whopping 278 yards on average on the ground.  Compare that to the 157 yards they average over the season and you see why Ohio State will likely try to follow the Crimson Tide/Tiger blueprint.

But can they execute like Alabama and Auburn?  Yes and no.

50976_cameron_newton__jake_bequette__dequinta_jones_medium

Follow the leader.


On one hand, no one will confuse Daniel "Boom" Herron and Brandon Saine with Mark Ingram and Trent Richardson.  Both Alabama backs are bigger (5' 10'' and 215 lbs, and 5' 11' and 220 lbs versus 5' 10'' and 202 lbs, and 6' 1'' and 219 lbs) and more physical than their Ohio State counterparts.  That being said, both Saine and Herron are dangerous on the edge, where Arkansas has struggled to clean up plays.

The same goes for Terrelle Pryor and Cam Newton, although here the comparison is slightly-more flattering for the Buckeyes.  On October 16th, Newton exploded on the ground against Arkansas, gaining 188 yards on 25 carries -- including a 40 yard long -- for three touchdowns.  The Razorbacks struggled to contain the 6' 6'' 250 pound monster.  At 6' 6'' and 233 pounds, Pryor is a similar athletic specimen, with a nose for the sidelines.

And that's not even the best news for Ohio State fans.  In their breakout game against Arkansas, Auburn didn't have to pass to set up the run.  17 of the Tiger's first 24 plays from scrimmage were on the ground.  In other words, the Tigers ran to run, and they had little trouble moving the chains even when Arkansas knew what was coming.  So if you expect the Buckeyes to come out slinging it like they did in last year's Rose Bowl Game versus Oregon, think again.

But don't throw the confetti in the air.  After all, we're just looking at one side of the Sugar Bowl matchup.  On the other, Arkansas' 3rd ranked passing attack threatens to expose a thin Ohio State secondary.  If Ryan Mallett and the Hogs jump out to an early lead, Ohio State's ground gameplan will go by the wayside.  After all, this isn't an offense built to come back.

More on the Sugar Bowl next week.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Off Tackle Empire

You must be a member of Off Tackle Empire to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Off Tackle Empire. You should read them.

Join Off Tackle Empire

You must be a member of Off Tackle Empire to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Off Tackle Empire. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker