Ranking the Big Ten Bowls by Difficulty

Rushing attacks are the key to the Big Ten's bowl success in 2010
Last year, I started the tradition of kicking off bowl coverage on the site with a big picture article examining the most and least favorable bowl matchups for the conference. In 2009 Big Ten teams competed in seven bowls, winning four of them -- including two of the three games I picked as most difficult. This year, a record eight Big Ten teams received bowl bids. Let's take a look at how all eight bowls stack up against each other in degree of difficulty (easiest to hardest), and the likelihood of a Big Ten win in each one.
But first, a quick note. As of this morning the Big Ten is favored in only one of its bowls (Sugar). This means that Vegas is skeptical of a repeat of last year when the conference upset four Top 15 teams. Although I'm a lot more bullish than the guys at the MGM Grand, my win percentages do take the expert's odds into account.
8. Sugar Bowl (Ohio State v. Arkansas) January 4th, New Orleans, LA
There's no such thing as a slam dunk BCS bowl. Just ask Oklahoma. There's also no question that Arkansas boasts one of the best offenses in the country. Or that Ohio State has struggled mightily in bowl games against the SEC (0-9). So why am I calling this the most likely win for the conference? Two reasons: First, it's the lesser of eight evils. Out of all the Big Ten bowl matchups, I think Ohio State is most likely to get a win. Second, Arkansas' run defense ranks tenth in the SEC. That makes the Buckeyes a more complete team.
Don't get me wrong, Ryan Mallett may expose an Ohio State secondary that has the fewest number of playmakers it's had in half a decade. But the last time Ohio State played a team with an explosive offense and a marginal defense in a bowl game (Oregon), things turned out all right.
Who wants to be there more? Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 56%

7. Rose Bowl (Wisconsin v. TCU) January 1st, Pasadena, CA
Everyone seems to agree this game won't be close, it's just no one can agree on who's going to destroy who. The matchup ESPN will beat to death is Wisconsin's triple-headed rushing monster versus TCU's rushing defense, which ranks third in the country. What the talking heads will overlook is the fact that the Horned Frogs have only faced one other Top 15 rushing offense all season (Air Force). Sure, they held the Falcons to just over half of their season-rushing yard average, but the vast majority of the teams they faced rank 90th or lower in rushing offense.
The bottom line is the Horned Frogs haven't seen anything like James White, Montee Ball, and John Clay, or Wisconsin's offensive line. I don't want to be a mid-major hater, but I like the Badger's chances of grinding this one out on the ground.
Also, don't forget the fact that Pasadena wasn't TCU's first choice for a postseason destination, while Bret Bielema and the Badgers couldn't be happier to be playing in the Granddaddy of Em' All.
Who wants to be there more? Wisconsin
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 55%
6. Texas Bowl (Illinois v. Baylor) December 29th, Houston, TX
Both of these teams ended the season on a sour note -- Baylor dropped its final three games after a 7-2 start while Illinois lost 3 of its final 4. Adam Rittenberg hits this one on the head, it's a question of which Illini team shows up: "If it’s the one that pounded Penn State and Northwestern and beat a good Northern Illinois team, the Illini have a good shot to win. But if it’s the one we saw Friday night against Fresno State or Nov. 13 against Minnesota, it’ll be a long night."
Two units stand out to me: Illinois' pass defense and Baylor's run defense. Whichever plays better on December 29th will likely earn the win. I give a slight edge to the Illini.
Who wants to be there more? Baylor
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 51%
5. Outback Bowl (Penn State v. Florida) January 1st, Tampa, FL
I don't believe in the transitive property in sports, but Penn State's 24-3 loss to Alabama looked at lot better after Florida drowned 31-6 in Tuscaloosa. Penn State's offense is bad, but Florida's is terrible. The good news for the Gators? Their defense is still Top 10 on paper. This game comes down to whether Penn State can move the football. Although the 2005 Capital One Bowl is still fresh in my mind, I'm skeptical.
Who wants to be there more? Penn State
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 50%
4. Gator Bowl (Michigan v. Mississippi State) January 1st, Jacksonville, FL
This Mississippi State team took two elite teams to the wire (Auburn, Arkansas). Michigan got crushed by every good team it played -- unless you want to count Connecticut as a good team. The Bulldogs are functional on both sides of the ball. Their offense ranks 47th nationally and their defense ranks 53rd. The Wolverines are an elite offense on paper (8th nationally), but their formula stalls against competent defenses. Meanwhile their defense is an absolute abomination (108th nationally).
Really, the only thing Michigan has going for it is the Rich Rodriguez factor. Players know that a loss in this one probably means the ax for their head coach. I think they're going to give it their all. Whether that's enough is another question.
Who wants to be there more? Michigan
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 48%
3. Insight Bowl (Iowa v. Missouri) December 28th, Tempe, AZ
Talk about chameleons. One week Iowa plays like a Top 10 program. The next, they play like a cellar dweller. About the only thing consistent about these Hawkeyes is their tendency to collapse in the fourth quarter. That means if the game is anywhere within 7 points heading into the final 15 minutes, save yourself the trouble and turn it off.
The only other time Missouri faced a Top 15 defense (Nebraska) this season, they got shut down. That's why I think Iowa has a chance in this one. At the end of the day though, Missouri is a lot more consistent, hence their 10-2 record compared to Iowa's 7-5. (Feel free to take this moment to laugh at the Big Twelve's bowl tie-ins).
Another factor to concern Iowans: off field trouble. A number of sources have reported dissent among players in the locker room. And just yesterday star wide receiver Derrell Johnson Koulianos was arrested on drug possession charges. Iowa's lack of cohesion doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Their win percentage reflects that.
Who wants to be there more? Missouri
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 45%
2. Capital One Bowl (Michigan State v. Alabama) January 1st, Orlando, FL
It's not a popular view, but I'm one of those people that still thinks Alabama is the most talented team in the nation, and if you played the season 1,000 times, Bama wins the national championship more often than not. It's also not a popular view, but I can't get the image of Michigan State being disemboweled by a 7-5 Iowa team out of my mind.
Still, the Spartan's run defense is solid (21st nationally), and Auburn gave them a rubric for silencing Mark Ingram.
The Spartans will need to be at their best to hang with Alabama. Hopefully the disappointment from being snubbed by the BCS will give the players a chip on their shoulders rather than a lack of motivation. The good news for Sparty is I don't think Alabama is exactly thrilled to be ringing in the New Year in Orlando either.
Who wants to be there more? Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 43%
1. TicketCity Bowl (Northwestern v. Texas Tech) January 1st, Dallas, TX + 11.5
Northwestern ranked 74th in total offense in November, compared to 34th in October. The difference, of course, is Dan Persa. The Wildcats have struggled on both sides of the ball since his season-ending injury on November 13th. Unless Evan Watkins makes tremendous strides over the next month, Texas Tech -- with veteran depth at the quarterback position -- and a "home field advantage" will continue to stand between the Wildcats and their first bowl victory since 1949.
Who wants to be there more? Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 40%
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Really, the only thing Michigan has going for it is the Rich Rodriguez factor. Players know that a loss in this one probably means the ax for their head coach. I think they’re going their all. Whether that’s enough, is another question.
This is half-true. The Michigan players are tremendously supportive of Rich and play hard for him. However, his fate doesn’t rest on the bowl game, it rests on whether the UM AD calls Jim Harbaugh.
Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
Harbaugh
would very much prefer a position with the pros. Taking the U(sed2)M(atter) job would set his career back by at least a decade at this point.
The decision on whether to keep RRod or not has already been made. The AD just won’t announce it until after the bowl game.
I doubt it.
Harbaugh is a Michigan alum. Juvenile abbreviation humor aside, he runs a style of football that would be very attractive to a large, powerful Big Ten school like that. Michigan has the ability to draw excellent recruits, has exceptional facilities, and has a lot of tradition as a football power. The systematic dismantling of that tradition by Captain Spread from out East has not destroyed it. The Michigan program can be salvaged, and very quickly, if the right coach is hired. In case you hadn’t noticed, teams without a defense (and coaches that don’t care about defenses) in the Big Ten tend not to do so well.
So what if I tailgate to the NPR jazz station?
Rankings based on nothing but my personal opinion
8. Wisconsin — TCU Big Ten Chances: 85%
7. Penn State — Florida 80%
6. Ohio State — Arkansas 66%
5. Michigan State — Alabama 55%
4. Illinois — Baylor 50%
3. Iowa — Mizzou 50%
2. Northwestern — Texas Tech 30%
1. Michigan — Mississippi State 20%
I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.
That's terrific. I'd like to load up on
TCU at 11:1
Florida at 4:1
Arkansas 2:1
Unless you are happy to hold money with those promised pay-outs, you don’t really believe those are the probabilities.
"They've just discovered a new use for sheep over there at Clemson... wool." - Lewis Grizzard
by GwinnettGamecock on Dec 9, 2010 11:01 AM CST up reply actions
11:1 is not 85%
That would be 91.7%. 85% is closer to 6:1 (85.7%).
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
Ohio State has beaten 3 college QBs better than Mallett in the 2nd half of the season
in Stanzi, Robinson, and McGloin. I’m not saying they’re better pro prospects; I am saying that they’re better college QBs. If Ohio State doesn’t make Mallett look every bit as mortal-to-bad as they made those guys look, I will be convinced that OSU will never beat an SEC team in a bowl game.
I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.
I respectfully disagree...
Total O Passing Passing Eff.
Stanzi 45th 30th 11th
Robinson 3rd 65th 20th
McGloin NR NR NR
Pryor 26th 51st 14th
Mallett 13th 5th 3rd
You may very well make him look “mortal-to-bad”, but nobody this season, except for maybe Bama, has been able to accomplish that yet…
Hope it’s a great game with no serious injuries and look forward to some good natured back and forths that will surely come in the next month. Can’t wait to be on Bourbon!
WOOOOOO PIG SOOIE!!!!
You're on crack...
…none of those 3 comes close to Mallett’s ability as a passer, and only Michigan’s overall offense is in the same conversation as Arkansas’
Umm...
Yeah. Basically what Spartan D said.
In what universe is Matt McGloin a feasible starting QB? No. I would start Bolden week-in, week-out, moxie be damned. Because pulling an 09 Scott Tolzien is NOT going to get you an upset in Ohio Stadium.
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 8, 2010 2:58 PM CST up reply actions
That’s crazy. Mallett is better than all three of them. Including McGloin in that comparison is an absolute joke.
IMO
Matt McGloin < Joe Bauserman. And Joe Bauserman is EPIC FAIL.
Bolden IS the future at Penn State.
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 8, 2010 6:27 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with you OBrien
Although, only on the second part. I would much rather have McGloin then Epic Fail.
Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!
by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 9, 2010 7:02 PM CST up reply actions
You're joking.
Mallet is easily the best QB that Ohio State will face all season.
Next thing you know, you’ll tell us that JaFOURy Harris should have won the Heisman
Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!
by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 9, 2010 7:03 PM CST up reply actions
Mallett < Tolzien
One of them IS their offense, the other is not. One threw horrible interceptions to blow a game against Alabama, the other upset the #1 team in the nation.
Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 11, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions
Does the order change at all
if the rumors that Urban Meyer is retiring this afternoon are true? If so, how?
"Bama Hawkeye, you know, the Iowa blogger who actually uses reason and analysis." - Patrick Vint
http://www.offtackleempire.com
I think Florida will benefit...
…but I don’t think it will help them a ton. I’d move the game up one spot on the list. If at all.
Quite surprised at the love I’m seeing for Mississippi State. They held Auburn to 17 before Newton went full ham, were not a threat to Alabama or LSU, and have zero wins that really inspire me. Only the loss to Arkansas is in any way impressive to me.
Engage SEC circular logic argument to refute
Miss State is in the ESS EEE SEE, son, and in the ESS EEE SEE they have the 12 greatest teams in all of college football. Evahh.
When an ESS EE SEE team loses t’anothahh ESS EE SEE team it’s like Muhammad Ali fighting Muhammad Ali every week.
Cuz it’s the ESS EE SEE.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
by Ted Glover on Dec 8, 2010 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
WTF?
What’ss that supposed to mean? I am sorry. Us Northerners can’t quite follow the slow southerners logic or sentences at times.
That'd probably be satire.
I would assume you’re kidding, but your body of work in this thread would lend evidence to the contrary.
So what if I tailgate to the NPR jazz station?
Rec'd
Bucky's 5th Quarter The best site for Badger news on the web!
Follow me on Twitter for the latest Badger Bits @veldyhoosey
On, Wisconsin!
by John Veldhuis on Dec 9, 2010 9:27 PM CST up reply actions
Best be fiddling with Penn State’s odds. Urbz is retiring after the bowl game. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5899478
I’m not sure if this makes things better or worse for JoePa.
For that matter, Michigan fans have to be pleased that Dan Mullen might not be at Mississippi State much longer.
Where is he supposed to be going?
THe only job I heard him linked to was Minnesota, ironically. Well, I guess with Florida looking for a coach, and his ties there, that would make sense.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
The U has got to be pissed
really thought Mullen was going to end up there. And might have but for Meyer.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
By my rankings
All percentages are for Big Ten winning.
Michigan State-Alabama: 54.3% basic, 23.4%/7.5 margin-aware
Penn State-Florida: 44.8% basic, 30.5%/5 margin-aware
Ohio State-Arkansas: 35.5% basic, 53.8%/-1 margin-aware
Illinois-Baylor: 34.4% basic, 63.0%/-3 margin-aware
Michigan-Mississippi State: 33.8% basic, 22.0%/8 margin-aware
Wisconsin-TCU: 30.6% basic, 16.6%/10 margin-aware
Northwestern-Texas Tech: 30.3% basic, 23.9%/7 margin-aware
Iowa-Missouri: 16.4% basic, 25.9%/6.5 margin-aware
Only favored in one or two games, depending on which set of rankings you use. Average of 2.80 or 2.77 wins.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
I think that's where two 1-point wins really hurt Wisconsin
TCU had three games closer than 27 points, only one one-score game. So their effective record (measured in victory points) for the margin-aware system was 11.37/12, compared to Wisconsin’s 9.83/12. Even with Wisconsin having a substantially tougher schedule, that hurts.
I don’t think that’s how it’s going to play out either; with every game weighted equally the system doesn’t know that Wisconsin’s been smacking people around late in the season and the close calls are seemingly a thing of the past. And the computer can’t analyze the matchups and see “hm, TCU run defense going up against the five Sherman tanks on the Wisconsin OL for the first time, that probably favors Wisconsin more than pure numbers would suggest”.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
That substantially better Wisconsin schedule that’s rated 71 by sagarin as compared to TCU’s 82. That’s with two great teams in Ohio State and Michigan State factored in. Better yes but I would hardly call that substantially better.
by Cincos on Dec 9, 2010 7:36 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Sagarin and the others are pseudo math
no one in the Big Ten plays a schedule that’s 71st in difficulty. Anyone who plays in the Big Ten, SEC, Pac-Ten, or even Big 12 has a really tough road to navigate each year.
I think Sagarin puts too much emphasis on how good or bad your cupcakes are.
Once you’re at a 95%+ chance of winning, it doesn’t really make much difference if you go to 99%.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
by SpartanDan on Dec 9, 2010 6:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Definitely
Cupcakes are cupcakes, and Wisconsin’s SOS is ranked horribly because our cupcakes sucked more than other cupcakes. TCU hasn’t played teams at the level of Ohio State and Michigan State this year.
Bucky's 5th Quarter - All Badgers, all the time.
by Adam Tupitza on Dec 10, 2010 7:56 AM CST up reply actions
Even as a TCU fan I’d have to be delusional to argue they played teams of that caliber. But I also think it’s important to remember that Wisconsin split their two toughest test. What I’m trying to say is that while I agree the Wisconsin schedule is tougher the gap is really not as large as people are making it out to be. Both teams played 5 teams with winning records and one 6-6 team. Overall their opponents total wins/losses are virtually the same. I honestly feel its going to be a tremendous game between two great teams.
by Cincos on Dec 10, 2010 11:07 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Funny
how you come up with excuses to explain away the low WI-TCU rating when challenged. Can you now explain away the rest? What a load. Develop a better system that you don’t have to explain things away that you predict…
I'm not explaining anything away.
I’m explaining how the system comes to that conclusion. There’s a difference.
The numbers are what they are; my personal opinion doesn’t have to match them. And I don’t think any system that I (or anyone else) managed to agree with 100% of the time would be very likely to be a good system. If it came out with exactly the same rankings as my opinion, it would mean one of two things: either 1) I’d eliminated all biases, even subconscious ones, from my opinion, or 2) I’d incorporated said biases into the system. The first one is impossible, and the second is Billingsley.
Besides, maybe I’m wrong about Wisconsin’s chances being better than that. We have about 5% of the data I’d need to have confidence that any set of rankings is definitive (I’d want to see home-and-home with everybody, at minimum, before I’d say we know with anything approaching certainty the exact order everyone should be placed – and then we wouldn’t need computers, we could just look at the record).
I could try to incorporate things like matchups and style of play variables in (this team does better than expected, even given its rating, against power-rushing teams but fares poorly against teams with a good pass rush), but that would:
- be vastly more complicated (I have a day job, I don’t get to spend all day tweaking it; the original idea was to do something simple using only game scores),
- suffer from massive sample size problems (750 or so data points with 120 teams is already way too few, trying to tease out correlations like that would be no better than a blind guess more often than not), and
- have a much higher probability of accidentally introducing a bias.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
So is this guy just a local OTE troll? Or...?
"This is an easy choice- feral pigs plus land mines equals random, airborne bacon." - blanx73
by The Ghost of John Hannah on Dec 10, 2010 3:30 PM CST up reply actions
The Sugar Bowl is easily...
…the closest matched game in the bowls this season…comparing Mallett the the QB’s you compared him to is laughable…by the way, Pryor has as many inteceptions as Mallet with maybe a quarter of the try’s…keep on thinking it’s a cakewalk…lol. OSU is not the best Team that the Hogs have faced this year…but the Hogs are the best team that OSU will face this year. Good Luck.

by 
































