Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lakers Should Trade Andrew Bynum So He Doesn't Go To Waste

Ranking the Big Ten Bowls by Difficulty

Gyi0062453760_medium
Rushing attacks are the key to the Big Ten's bowl success in 2010

Last year, I started the tradition of kicking off bowl coverage on the site with a big picture article examining the most and least favorable bowl matchups for the conference.  In 2009 Big Ten teams competed in seven bowls, winning four of them -- including two of the three games I picked as most difficult.  This year, a record eight Big Ten teams received bowl bids.  Let's take a look at how all eight bowls stack up against each other in degree of difficulty (easiest to hardest), and the likelihood of a Big Ten win in each one.

But first, a quick note.  As of this morning the Big Ten is favored in only one of its bowls (Sugar).  This means that Vegas is skeptical of a repeat of last year when the conference upset four Top 15 teams.  Although I'm a lot more bullish than the guys at the MGM Grand, my win percentages do take the expert's odds into account.

8. Sugar Bowl (Ohio State v. Arkansas) January 4th, New Orleans, LA

There's no such thing as a slam dunk BCS bowl.  Just ask Oklahoma.  There's also no question that Arkansas boasts one of the best offenses in the country.  Or that Ohio State has struggled mightily in bowl games against the SEC (0-9).  So why am I calling this the most likely win for the conference?  Two reasons: First, it's the lesser of eight evils.  Out of all the Big Ten bowl matchups, I think Ohio State is most likely to get a win.  Second, Arkansas' run defense ranks tenth in the SEC.  That makes the Buckeyes a more complete team.

Don't get me wrong, Ryan Mallett may expose an Ohio State secondary that has the fewest number of playmakers it's had in half a decade.  But the last time Ohio State played a team with an explosive offense and a marginal defense in a bowl game (Oregon), things turned out all right.

Who wants to be there more?  Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 56%

50311_big_uglies_bowl_football_medium
Gabe Carimi and John Moffitt: Making sure this year's Rose Bowl looks a lot like the last time Wisconsin was in Pasadena


7. Rose Bowl (Wisconsin v. TCU) January 1st, Pasadena, CA


Everyone seems to agree this game won't be close, it's just no one can agree on who's going to destroy who.  The matchup ESPN will beat to death is Wisconsin's triple-headed rushing monster versus TCU's rushing defense, which ranks third in the country.  What the talking heads will overlook is the fact that the Horned Frogs have only faced one other Top 15 rushing offense all season (Air Force).  Sure, they held the Falcons to just over half of their season-rushing yard average, but the vast majority of the teams they faced rank 90th or lower in rushing offense.

The bottom line is the Horned Frogs haven't seen anything like James White, Montee Ball, and John Clay, or Wisconsin's offensive line.  I don't want to be a mid-major hater, but I like the Badger's chances of grinding this one out on the ground.

Also, don't forget the fact that Pasadena wasn't TCU's first choice for a postseason destination, while Bret Bielema and the Badgers couldn't be happier to be playing in the Granddaddy of Em' All.

Who wants to be there more?  Wisconsin
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 55%


6. Texas Bowl (Illinois v. Baylor) December 29th, Houston, TX

Both of these teams ended the season on a sour note -- Baylor dropped its final three games after a 7-2 start while Illinois lost 3 of its final 4.  Adam Rittenberg hits this one on the head, it's a question of which Illini team shows up: "If it’s the one that pounded Penn State and Northwestern and beat a good Northern Illinois team, the Illini have a good shot to win. But if it’s the one we saw Friday night against Fresno State or Nov. 13 against Minnesota, it’ll be a long night."

Two units stand out to me: Illinois' pass defense and Baylor's run defense.  Whichever plays better on December 29th will likely earn the win.  I give a slight edge to the Illini.

Who wants to be there more?  Baylor
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 51%

Star-divide

5. Outback Bowl (Penn State v. Florida) January 1st, Tampa, FL

I don't believe in the transitive property in sports, but Penn State's 24-3 loss to Alabama looked at lot better after Florida drowned 31-6 in Tuscaloosa.  Penn State's offense is bad, but Florida's is terrible.  The good news for the Gators?  Their defense is still Top 10 on paper.  This game comes down to whether Penn State can move the football.  Although the 2005 Capital One Bowl is still fresh in my mind, I'm skeptical.

Who wants to be there more?  Penn State
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 50%

Gyi0062624875_medium
Fast and fragile.



4. Gator Bowl (Michigan v. Mississippi State) January 1st, Jacksonville, FL

This Mississippi State team took two elite teams to the wire (Auburn, Arkansas).  Michigan got crushed by every good team it played -- unless you want to count Connecticut as a good team.  The Bulldogs are functional on both sides of the ball.  Their offense ranks 47th nationally and their defense ranks 53rd.  The Wolverines are an elite offense on paper (8th nationally), but their formula stalls against competent defenses.  Meanwhile their defense is an absolute abomination (108th nationally).

Really, the only thing Michigan has going for it is the Rich Rodriguez factor.  Players know that a loss in this one probably means the ax for their head coach.  I think they're going to give it their all.  Whether that's enough is another question.

Who wants to be there more?  Michigan
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 48%


3. Insight Bowl (Iowa v. Missouri) December 28th, Tempe, AZ

Talk about chameleons.  One week Iowa plays like a Top 10 program.  The next, they play like a cellar dweller.  About the only thing consistent about these Hawkeyes is their tendency to collapse in the fourth quarter.  That means if the game is anywhere within 7 points heading into the final 15 minutes, save yourself the trouble and turn it off.

The only other time Missouri faced a Top 15 defense (Nebraska) this season, they got shut down.  That's why I think Iowa has a chance in this one.  At the end of the day though, Missouri is a lot more consistent, hence their 10-2 record compared to Iowa's 7-5.  (Feel free to take this moment to laugh at the Big Twelve's bowl tie-ins). 

Another factor to concern Iowans: off field trouble.  A number of sources have reported dissent among players in the locker room.  And just yesterday star wide receiver Derrell Johnson Koulianos was arrested on drug possession charges.  Iowa's lack of cohesion doesn't exactly inspire confidence.  Their win percentage reflects that.

Who wants to be there more?  Missouri
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 45%

44343_michigan_st_jones_football_medium
Can't wait to meet Mark Ingram.



2. Capital One Bowl (Michigan State v. Alabama) January 1st, Orlando, FL

It's not a popular view, but I'm one of those people that still thinks Alabama is the most talented team in the nation, and if you played the season 1,000 times, Bama wins the national championship more often than not.  It's also not a popular view, but I can't get the image of Michigan State being disemboweled by a 7-5 Iowa team out of my mind.

Still, the Spartan's run defense is solid (21st nationally), and Auburn gave them a rubric for silencing Mark Ingram. 

The Spartans will need to be at their best to hang with Alabama.  Hopefully the disappointment from being snubbed by the BCS will give the players a chip on their shoulders rather than a lack of motivation.  The good news for Sparty is I don't think Alabama is exactly thrilled to be ringing in the New Year in Orlando either.

Who wants to be there more? Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 43%


1. TicketCity Bowl (Northwestern v. Texas Tech) January 1st, Dallas, TX
+ 11.5

Northwestern ranked 74th in total offense in November, compared to 34th in October.  The difference, of course, is Dan Persa.  The Wildcats have struggled on both sides of the ball since his season-ending injury on November 13th.  Unless Evan Watkins makes tremendous strides over the next month, Texas Tech -- with veteran depth at the quarterback position -- and a "home field advantage" will continue to stand between the Wildcats and their first bowl victory since 1949.

Who wants to be there more? Push
Big Ten's Chances of a Win: 40%

Comment 46 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Really, the only thing Michigan has going for it is the Rich Rodriguez factor. Players know that a loss in this one probably means the ax for their head coach. I think they’re going their all. Whether that’s enough, is another question.

This is half-true. The Michigan players are tremendously supportive of Rich and play hard for him. However, his fate doesn’t rest on the bowl game, it rests on whether the UM AD calls Jim Harbaugh.

Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.

by Graham Filler on Dec 8, 2010 10:57 AM CST reply actions  

Harbaugh

would very much prefer a position with the pros. Taking the U(sed2)M(atter) job would set his career back by at least a decade at this point.

The decision on whether to keep RRod or not has already been made. The AD just won’t announce it until after the bowl game.

by St8rBoiInMN on Dec 8, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry, I’m a little too classy to call them anything but the University of Michigan (or UM or Mich or something).

Come on, leave the tacky and painful puns to tOSU.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 10:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I doubt it.

Harbaugh is a Michigan alum. Juvenile abbreviation humor aside, he runs a style of football that would be very attractive to a large, powerful Big Ten school like that. Michigan has the ability to draw excellent recruits, has exceptional facilities, and has a lot of tradition as a football power. The systematic dismantling of that tradition by Captain Spread from out East has not destroyed it. The Michigan program can be salvaged, and very quickly, if the right coach is hired. In case you hadn’t noticed, teams without a defense (and coaches that don’t care about defenses) in the Big Ten tend not to do so well.

So what if I tailgate to the NPR jazz station?

by hkobb7 on Dec 12, 2010 9:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Rankings based on nothing but my personal opinion

8. Wisconsin — TCU Big Ten Chances: 85%
7. Penn State — Florida 80%
6. Ohio State — Arkansas 66%
5. Michigan State — Alabama 55%
4. Illinois — Baylor 50%
3. Iowa — Mizzou 50%
2. Northwestern — Texas Tech 30%
1. Michigan — Mississippi State 20%

I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.

by ckmneon on Dec 8, 2010 12:25 PM CST reply actions  

Much closer

to my gut feel than the cra@p Johnathan posted…

by St8rBoiInMN on Dec 8, 2010 9:34 PM CST up reply actions  

That's terrific. I'd like to load up on

TCU at 11:1
Florida at 4:1
Arkansas 2:1

Unless you are happy to hold money with those promised pay-outs, you don’t really believe those are the probabilities.

"They've just discovered a new use for sheep over there at Clemson... wool." - Lewis Grizzard

by GwinnettGamecock on Dec 9, 2010 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

11:1 is not 85%

That would be 91.7%. 85% is closer to 6:1 (85.7%).

I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by SpartanDan on Dec 9, 2010 6:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Ohio State has beaten 3 college QBs better than Mallett in the 2nd half of the season

in Stanzi, Robinson, and McGloin. I’m not saying they’re better pro prospects; I am saying that they’re better college QBs. If Ohio State doesn’t make Mallett look every bit as mortal-to-bad as they made those guys look, I will be convinced that OSU will never beat an SEC team in a bowl game.

I've got the brains. You've got the looks. Let's make lots of money.

by ckmneon on Dec 8, 2010 12:33 PM CST reply actions  

I respectfully disagree...

Total O Passing Passing Eff.
Stanzi 45th 30th 11th
Robinson 3rd 65th 20th
McGloin NR NR NR
Pryor 26th 51st 14th
Mallett 13th 5th 3rd

You may very well make him look “mortal-to-bad”, but nobody this season, except for maybe Bama, has been able to accomplish that yet…

Hope it’s a great game with no serious injuries and look forward to some good natured back and forths that will surely come in the next month. Can’t wait to be on Bourbon!

WOOOOOO PIG SOOIE!!!!

by uam_hog on Dec 8, 2010 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

You're on crack...

…none of those 3 comes close to Mallett’s ability as a passer, and only Michigan’s overall offense is in the same conversation as Arkansas’

by Spartan D on Dec 8, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Umm...

Yeah. Basically what Spartan D said.

In what universe is Matt McGloin a feasible starting QB? No. I would start Bolden week-in, week-out, moxie be damned. Because pulling an 09 Scott Tolzien is NOT going to get you an upset in Ohio Stadium.

Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 8, 2010 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

That’s crazy. Mallett is better than all three of them. Including McGloin in that comparison is an absolute joke.

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 8, 2010 4:31 PM CST up reply actions  

IMO

Matt McGloin < Joe Bauserman. And Joe Bauserman is EPIC FAIL.

Bolden IS the future at Penn State.

Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 8, 2010 6:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you OBrien

Although, only on the second part. I would much rather have McGloin then Epic Fail.

Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!

by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 9, 2010 7:02 PM CST up reply actions  

You're joking.

Mallet is easily the best QB that Ohio State will face all season.

Next thing you know, you’ll tell us that JaFOURy Harris should have won the Heisman

Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!

by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Dec 9, 2010 7:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Mallett < Tolzien

One of them IS their offense, the other is not. One threw horrible interceptions to blow a game against Alabama, the other upset the #1 team in the nation.

Wisconsin, Big Ten Champions for the first time since 1999...
"What's your formula for the corner?" -Doctor Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Dec 11, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Does the order change at all

if the rumors that Urban Meyer is retiring this afternoon are true? If so, how?

"Bama Hawkeye, you know, the Iowa blogger who actually uses reason and analysis." - Patrick Vint

http://www.offtackleempire.com

by Bama Hawkeye on Dec 8, 2010 1:07 PM CST reply actions  

I think Florida will benefit...

…but I don’t think it will help them a ton. I’d move the game up one spot on the list. If at all.

by OSUreds on Dec 8, 2010 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Quite surprised at the love I’m seeing for Mississippi State. They held Auburn to 17 before Newton went full ham, were not a threat to Alabama or LSU, and have zero wins that really inspire me. Only the loss to Arkansas is in any way impressive to me.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

WTF?

What’ss that supposed to mean? I am sorry. Us Northerners can’t quite follow the slow southerners logic or sentences at times.

by St8rBoiInMN on Dec 8, 2010 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

That'd probably be satire.

I would assume you’re kidding, but your body of work in this thread would lend evidence to the contrary.

So what if I tailgate to the NPR jazz station?

by hkobb7 on Dec 12, 2010 9:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Rec'd

Bucky's 5th Quarter The best site for Badger news on the web!

Follow me on Twitter for the latest Badger Bits @veldyhoosey

On, Wisconsin!

by John Veldhuis on Dec 9, 2010 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Best be fiddling with Penn State’s odds. Urbz is retiring after the bowl game. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5899478

I’m not sure if this makes things better or worse for JoePa.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 2:04 PM CST reply actions  

For that matter, Michigan fans have to be pleased that Dan Mullen might not be at Mississippi State much longer.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Where is he supposed to be going?

THe only job I heard him linked to was Minnesota, ironically. Well, I guess with Florida looking for a coach, and his ties there, that would make sense.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

by Ted Glover on Dec 8, 2010 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Watch Florida announce his HC-ness in three days.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

The U has got to be pissed

really thought Mullen was going to end up there. And might have but for Meyer.

I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.

by HoyaGoon on Dec 9, 2010 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

By my rankings

All percentages are for Big Ten winning.

Michigan State-Alabama: 54.3% basic, 23.4%/7.5 margin-aware
Penn State-Florida: 44.8% basic, 30.5%/5 margin-aware
Ohio State-Arkansas: 35.5% basic, 53.8%/-1 margin-aware
Illinois-Baylor: 34.4% basic, 63.0%/-3 margin-aware
Michigan-Mississippi State: 33.8% basic, 22.0%/8 margin-aware
Wisconsin-TCU: 30.6% basic, 16.6%/10 margin-aware
Northwestern-Texas Tech: 30.3% basic, 23.9%/7 margin-aware
Iowa-Missouri: 16.4% basic, 25.9%/6.5 margin-aware

Only favored in one or two games, depending on which set of rankings you use. Average of 2.80 or 2.77 wins.

I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by SpartanDan on Dec 8, 2010 7:07 PM CST reply actions  

Wisconsin with a 16.6% chance of beating TCU doesn’t pass my eyeball metric.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 7:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that's where two 1-point wins really hurt Wisconsin

TCU had three games closer than 27 points, only one one-score game. So their effective record (measured in victory points) for the margin-aware system was 11.37/12, compared to Wisconsin’s 9.83/12. Even with Wisconsin having a substantially tougher schedule, that hurts.

I don’t think that’s how it’s going to play out either; with every game weighted equally the system doesn’t know that Wisconsin’s been smacking people around late in the season and the close calls are seemingly a thing of the past. And the computer can’t analyze the matchups and see “hm, TCU run defense going up against the five Sherman tanks on the Wisconsin OL for the first time, that probably favors Wisconsin more than pure numbers would suggest”.

I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by SpartanDan on Dec 8, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I don’t mean to impugn your system. I merely think that a cautious eye is required – no computer can ever have as much data as the human viewer, and additional data never resulted in a worse assessment.

by Erik T on Dec 8, 2010 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

That substantially better Wisconsin schedule that’s rated 71 by sagarin as compared to TCU’s 82. That’s with two great teams in Ohio State and Michigan State factored in. Better yes but I would hardly call that substantially better.

by Cincos on Dec 9, 2010 7:36 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Sagarin and the others are pseudo math

no one in the Big Ten plays a schedule that’s 71st in difficulty. Anyone who plays in the Big Ten, SEC, Pac-Ten, or even Big 12 has a really tough road to navigate each year.

by AhliBobwa on Dec 9, 2010 6:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Sagarin puts too much emphasis on how good or bad your cupcakes are.

Once you’re at a 95%+ chance of winning, it doesn’t really make much difference if you go to 99%.

I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by SpartanDan on Dec 9, 2010 6:42 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Definitely

Cupcakes are cupcakes, and Wisconsin’s SOS is ranked horribly because our cupcakes sucked more than other cupcakes. TCU hasn’t played teams at the level of Ohio State and Michigan State this year.

Bucky's 5th Quarter - All Badgers, all the time.

by Adam Tupitza on Dec 10, 2010 7:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Even as a TCU fan I’d have to be delusional to argue they played teams of that caliber. But I also think it’s important to remember that Wisconsin split their two toughest test. What I’m trying to say is that while I agree the Wisconsin schedule is tougher the gap is really not as large as people are making it out to be. Both teams played 5 teams with winning records and one 6-6 team. Overall their opponents total wins/losses are virtually the same. I honestly feel its going to be a tremendous game between two great teams.

by Cincos on Dec 10, 2010 11:07 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Funny

how you come up with excuses to explain away the low WI-TCU rating when challenged. Can you now explain away the rest? What a load. Develop a better system that you don’t have to explain things away that you predict…

by St8rBoiInMN on Dec 8, 2010 10:38 PM CST reply actions  

I'm not explaining anything away.

I’m explaining how the system comes to that conclusion. There’s a difference.

The numbers are what they are; my personal opinion doesn’t have to match them. And I don’t think any system that I (or anyone else) managed to agree with 100% of the time would be very likely to be a good system. If it came out with exactly the same rankings as my opinion, it would mean one of two things: either 1) I’d eliminated all biases, even subconscious ones, from my opinion, or 2) I’d incorporated said biases into the system. The first one is impossible, and the second is Billingsley.

Besides, maybe I’m wrong about Wisconsin’s chances being better than that. We have about 5% of the data I’d need to have confidence that any set of rankings is definitive (I’d want to see home-and-home with everybody, at minimum, before I’d say we know with anything approaching certainty the exact order everyone should be placed – and then we wouldn’t need computers, we could just look at the record).

I could try to incorporate things like matchups and style of play variables in (this team does better than expected, even given its rating, against power-rushing teams but fares poorly against teams with a good pass rush), but that would:

  • be vastly more complicated (I have a day job, I don’t get to spend all day tweaking it; the original idea was to do something simple using only game scores),
  • suffer from massive sample size problems (750 or so data points with 120 teams is already way too few, trying to tease out correlations like that would be no better than a blind guess more often than not), and
  • have a much higher probability of accidentally introducing a bias.

I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.

by SpartanDan on Dec 9, 2010 6:56 PM CST up reply actions  

So is this guy just a local OTE troll? Or...?

"This is an easy choice- feral pigs plus land mines equals random, airborne bacon." - blanx73

by The Ghost of John Hannah on Dec 10, 2010 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

The Sugar Bowl is easily...

…the closest matched game in the bowls this season…comparing Mallett the the QB’s you compared him to is laughable…by the way, Pryor has as many inteceptions as Mallet with maybe a quarter of the try’s…keep on thinking it’s a cakewalk…lol. OSU is not the best Team that the Hogs have faced this year…but the Hogs are the best team that OSU will face this year. Good Luck.

by Kelly Griffin on Dec 22, 2010 12:36 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


CONSIDER THEM ROLLED.


Managers

M_small Graham Filler

Cigar_small Jonathan Franz

Bama_hawkeye_small Bama Hawkeye

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Editors

Wrigleymarquee_small Hilary Lee

Authors

Small Chadnudj

Img-20101223-00043_small JDMill

Afudyfycaae-oai_jpg_large_small MSULaxer27

Small Paterno Ave

Smokecrop_small babaoreally

Sherman_sea_1868_small KennardHusker