Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: An Explanation For Some Of The Perplexing HOF Snubs

Michigan, NCAA Allegations, The Media, etc...

Capt

In case you haven't turned on the TV or fired up the ole' interweb (which is impossible, since you're reading this esteemed blog), you may have missed that the news about my beloved University that is being splattered across the ESPN bottom line. The University faces 5 NCAA violations, and has 90 days to respond. A recap of these violations:

• Football players were required to participate in more than the maximum allowed practice hours by anywhere from 20 minutes to two hours a week.

• Graduate assistant coach Alex Herron provided "false and misleading information" to NCAA enforcement staff on whether he monitored summer workouts he was not allowed to attend.

• Head coach Rich Rodriguez "failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance within the football program and failed to adequately monitor the duties and activities" of his quality control staff.

• The athletic department "failed to adequately monitor its football program to assure" NCAA compliance.

Not that we didn't know this was coming. Back in August when the Detroit Free Press's own joke of a journalist Michael Rosenberg broke his leaky and woefully underresearched, unsubstantiated, hyperbole-laden shot at Rich Rodriguez (but of course, I'm not biased), we knew this day would come. Admittedly, the charges are worse than many, including myself, had assumed them to be. However, it appears that many of the violated guidelines in question delineated by the NCAA are vague, misunderstood, and are commonly believed to be violated by pretty much every other major NCAA team. In terms of the violation, there are only a handful of REALLY bad charges in here (the dishonest grad student is shameful, but that's why he's not a coach). The blame lands squarely on Rodriguez for poor record-keeping practices by his subordinates, as well as a misinterpretation of the grey-areas in the NCAA guidelines concerning allotted stretching time and the roles of our "quality control staff." There certainly was no malicious intent. With this in mind, Michigan should emerge fairly unscathed from this whole ordeal. [Edit: the skinny on what exactly the allegations mean and their likely consequences are put in layman's terms here].

Let's just hope this is the end of it, and no backlash incident occurs that would further destabilize the already-fragile program. What kind of incident, you ask? Well, let's just hope somebody doesn't think it's an excellent idea to poll disgruntled former players on the matter for a bias-free opinion, blowing this whole thing out of proportion. D'oh! Ladies and gentlemen, Morgan Trent:

Star-divide

Morgan Trent, former U-M cornerback, played one year under Rodriguez: "I'm not surprised because I know what happened, and I know what kind of rules were broken. I couldn't see how they were going to get out of that.

"Whatever steps need to be taken (to restore Michigan's winning tradition), I'm all for it. What is happening right now obviously is not working. I don't know how long they're going to let this last until changes are made. This year is going to be the tell-all what's going to happen. We can't have three losing years in a row. Not at Michigan. To lose seven of last eight games (in 2009) is an embarrassment."

So much for promoting an environment of unity. You know what I think is an embarrassment? Former players who got regularly smoked during their career as a woefully average defensive back, then dish on a coach they only had for one year. Well, this is a fine mess we've gotten ourselves into. 

What does everybody want here? The answer has been painfully clear since the Detroit Free Press villified Rich Rodriguez as soon as he was hired for the whole buyout shenanigans: the Detroit Free Press wants Rich Rodriguez out at all costs, and they're willing to burn their university to the ground in order to get it. 

The Freep's agenda is unfair, and it's irresponsible as a (formerly) respected "news" source. The worst part: it's obvious. Consider, for example, the Freep's all out indictment of Practice Gate 2009, with front page spreads about Rodriguez mistreating his players, making them practice for hours and hours (Rosenberg reported 9 additiona hours of practice on sunday. The actual amount of time exceeded was 20 minutes. Stretching.). Then, on signing day earlier this month, the Freep immediately persecuted Rodriguez, demonizing him as sullying the good name of the University, by signing the "criminal" mega-athlete Demar Dorsey (who was acquitted--read: all charges dismissed, not guilty--of crimes he was accused of committing when he was 16). Meanwhile, the freep relegates to the back page the news about MSU's Glenn Winston, who was released from 180 DAYS IN PRISON and was practicing the following week; reinstated immediately by Mark Dantonio. And it's not like this kid was drinking or smoking pot. Winston broke another human's skull. He spends 180 days in jail over the summer, and is back on the field in the fall. The lack of even any attempt to conceal the obvious double standard is laughable. To make matters worse, Michael Rosenberg, the Freep's king of anti-RR propoganda, is a Michigan grad. How's that for a laugh? But I digress.

What does this obvious anti-RR agenda accomplish? The answer may not be clear to those who wish to see RR fail, but it is painfully clear to the impartial observer, who is laughing as our program devours itself. The answer, of course, is nothing. 

Allow me to illustrate. After several stellar recruiting classes, Rich Rodriguez finally has his type of players in the system and is building the program in a way that he sees fit. The consensus, especially amongst those of the elite coaching ranks, is that Rich Rodriguez has this program poised for a breakthrough. Logically, Rodriguez has consistently won big at every level with his type of players--which, by the way, he has been lacking his first two years at Michigan--running his type of system. Given a few years for these players to mature, there is little doubt that Rich Rodriguez will start to win. 

Now, let's hypothetically say that Rosenberg et al succeed in ousting the embattled Rodriguez after 3 consecutive losing seasons. Let's say optimally, best case scenario, Meech hires Bo's former All American QB and current Stanford wonder-coach Jim Harbaugh to take over the reigns. What then? Harbaugh runs a pro-style offense, and finds the personnel recruited for Rodriguez's spread n' shred ill-suited for his needs. Another losing season as Harbaugh scrambles (ha!) to assemble his recruits. Then another disappointing season for good measure as Harbaugh's super recruiting class are all freshmen and need to mature. That will be a total of 6 years since Lloyd left that the program begins to win. Wheras in the first place if everybody had kept their mouths shut, Rodriguez would have had this program winning in a total of 4 years at the helm. Another coaching change only brings more instability, more uncertainty and more losses. 

Doesn't Rosenberg realize that this is realistically the best situation that he can hope for? If he succeeds, his beloved University will stumble for more than half a decade and emerge a battered mess with it's integrity barely intact, a shadow of its former self, ruined by his own hand. And who suffers the most from this whole ordeal? Rodriguez? Think again. The student athletes. For example, it wasn't enough for Rosenberg to ruin one of most important days in young Demar Dorsey's life, the day he announces which University he will be attending for the next four years, for his own agenda. Now, thanks almost exclusively to Rosenberg, 18 year old Demar Dorsey will be scrutinized to a harrowing degree as soon as he arrives on campus. His every step will have the critics poised for him to screw up (or even appear to screw up) so that they can leap at the chance to indict Rodriguez again. That can't be a good feeling for an 18 year old (or anybody, really). But who cares, right? Score another tally for Rosenberg and the Freep. What about the athletes that RR has recruited, those that have bought into the system. If RR goes, these kids are hung out to dry as collateral damage until the next crop comes in. The impact on these kids' lives is insignificant when it comes to the agenda of the media, the boosters, disgruntled former players and the fans. They just want Rodriguez out at all costs. And apparently they're willing to compromise moral and ethical integrity by lying and exploiting young men in the program for their own gain (welcome to college football), all the while dragging their University's name through the dirt if that's what it takes. That's dastardly, if you ask me. 

Like it or not, the pressure for Rich Rodriguez to win has now been dialed up a notch. Though new AD and all around badass David Brandon has specifically stated that RR's job is not in jeopardy, many wonder if RR is worth the trouble he's brought. Whereas previously, many fans agreed that in all fairness Rodriguez should be allotted four to five years to prove himself. Now in light of these recent allegations, that wiggle room has shrunk dramatically to be, what many believe, entirely dependent on the team's performance this season. This added element of desperation, for both RR and the team, will make this upcoming season a very, very interesting one to watch. Michigan fan or not. 

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

MSU is on the back page because nobody cares about MSU.

Michigan is on the front page because NCAA rules violations are not piddly business. Despite your assertions, not every other school does this.

Brunettes not fighter jets

by rockyh on Feb 24, 2010 12:26 PM CST reply actions  

And you know this because you attend so many universities’ practices throughout the country?
While I may not have attended any practices, I believe it when reporters for national publications like Sports Illustrated and ESPN say that this kind of stuff goes on at just about every campus they have ever set foot on. Which isn’t to say I believe everything I read, but I think most of the national reporters don’t have the agenda Rosenberg does, nor do they have any reason to try and protect Michigan.
But you are probably right, not every university has broken these rules, but I am sure Michigan is not alone in it.

by Lostincali on Feb 24, 2010 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe after you scUM's get this fixed...

you can work on making The Game an actual rivalry again? Its not nearly as fun when you KNOW your gonna win…..

Out of Hound since 2008

by BuckeyeSki on Feb 24, 2010 1:00 PM CST reply actions  

ha, sort of like that feeling you get whenever you’re playing against OSU in a bowl game (poor-egon notwithstanding).

by GregGoBlue on Feb 24, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL @ poor-egon..

I suppose if my team’s season goal was to just have a shot at making the Beef O’Brady’s Bowl that I would be looking to poke fun at successful teams too. Good luck in the Motor City Bowl this year, that is if Tate Five-cier is still in one piece…..

Out of Hound since 2008

by BuckeyeSki on Feb 24, 2010 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

oh c’mon, as if being a Michigan fan wasn’t tough enough these days… I gotta hear it from you guys too? Grant me just this one, ok? It’s all I’ve got.

by GregGoBlue on Feb 24, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions  

good work G

Great work conveying tons of information and writing with a vitriol I’m not sure I could generate.

by Graham Filler on Feb 24, 2010 2:39 PM CST reply actions  

One thing the Anti-RR agenda accomplishes

Is exposure for a struggling old fixture of print media: The Detroit Free Press

I think you’re absolutely right that Freep has an agenda: it’s to sell papers, and convince advertisers to come back on board. You can’t do that and be overly judicious. For example, if you had titled this story “NCAA Sounds Michigan Death Knell,” it would probably start a flame war on message boards everywhere.

Instead, you wrote a sober, well-reasoned article that will be read by many, but won’t stir the pot. Good for you for having the confidence in your work to offer it with a grain of salt.

(For what it’s worth, I agree with you. Michigan will be fine).

The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.

by Jonathan Franz on Feb 24, 2010 2:41 PM CST reply actions  

Sober?! I resent that!

thanks for the kind words, Jon. As for the Freep, if the goal is to sell papers with sensationalist faux-journalism, I think their business model needs tweaking.

by GregGoBlue on Feb 24, 2010 4:09 PM CST up reply actions  

So, you're blaming everyone but RichRod

for what happened? Look, I’m an OSU guy, so take my opinion for what it’s worth, but Rich Rodriguez and his apologists have blamed everybody but him since the second he walked on campus. It wasn’t Rich’s fault he burned every bridge out of Morgantown, it was the WVU president. It wasn’t RichRod’s fault the buyout mess got ugly, those damn Mountaineers wanted him to actually, you know, honor the buyout clause of the contract he signed. After he threatened to leave if WVU didn’t upgrade their facilities.

It wasn’t RichRod’s fault that Michigan has sucked for the last two years, Lloyd Carr left the talent cupboard pretty bare and they couldn’t compete. It wasn’t Rich’s fault that Ryan Mallet left, or Justin Boren, they’re just no talent hacks that aren’t real ‘Michigan Men’. It wasn’t Rich’s fault that your defense was historically bad in 2009, it was Greg Robinson’s…who Rich hired, but that’s beside the point.

It’s not Rich’s fault that the coaching staff can’t comply with NCAA rules, it’s the fault of the extra grad assistants…which aren’t authorized, but that’s not Rich’s fault either. The damn media is out to get him, it’s not fair!!!

Now I do agree that you have a point in that the anti-Rodriguez camp has been in near zealot mode to get rid of him and supplant him with a ‘Michigan Man’ like Les Miles or Jim Harbaugh, but Rodriguez has given them plenty of ammo to load their guns and shoot.

Michigan made a deal with a snake oil salesman, and now bitch when it’s found out that he’s selling snake oil.

Seriously, what did you expect?

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by Ted Glover on Feb 24, 2010 7:34 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I agree 100%.

Yes, to a certain degree there is a vast (and I mean vast) conspiracy against Rich Rodriguez, comprised of pressure from both the external AND internal sources. The cards are undeniably stacked against the man. However, when it comes down running a business, the bottom line is you need to start producing and stop making excuses or you’re out, simple as that. Regardless of the circumstances, if the employee is unable to respond suitably to multiple incidences of adversity, or if that employee just seems to attract adversity, you may be better off without him if he’s not producing.

There are certain qualities you need to be an effective football coach in addition to X’s and O’s and desire. This is especially true at Michigan, the winningest program in college football history. Rich Rodriguez is learning this very quickly.

by GregGoBlue on Feb 25, 2010 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

The only thing that will save RR is a winning season

Because three consecutive losing seasons will NEVER be acceptable to Wolverine diehards…

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Feb 27, 2010 6:32 PM CST up reply actions  

The 'vast conspiracy' against RichRod

is largely of his own making. I get that there was a lot of upheaval when Rodriguez got hired, and that a sea change in philosophy can be tough to accept. Especially when Michigan has had a lot of success with ‘Michigan Men’ in the past. I never thought that an overhaul was necessary, but just a tweak.

That said, the cards would be a lot less stacked if RichRod hadn’t shit on tradition, Lloyd Carr, and the preogram’s integrity from almost the moment he stepped on campus. Now, had he won early and often this would be much ado about nothing.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by Ted Glover on Feb 28, 2010 3:59 PM CST up reply actions  

This latest round of nonsense isn’t entirely his fault, but there’s clearly more then enough blame to go around when you get to talking about the extra staff, etc. One thing’s for sure: though the most morally reprehensible of the alleged actions (player abuse through gross overpracticing) doesn’t seem to have taken place, all this other nonsense is stuff about which, to quote the great Quentin Tarantino, Rodriguez “should have better [friend]ing known better.”

A question, though: do you think June Jones did the wrong thing leaving Hawai’i because they wouldn’t upgrade his facilities? What about Brian Kelly, whose work with Cincinnati had — even despite their attempts to meet him in the middle — fallen through on really serious improvements, going to Notre Dame? Seems to me sometimes the coaches see more potential in a program than its accountants do, and that it’s reasonable to part ways when that’s the case.

It obviously doesn’t matter one way or another, since we’re debating the character of somebody neither of us really knows anything but headlines about, but that seems to be a strange thing to condemn somebody for.

by YpsiTerrier on Feb 25, 2010 6:48 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


I wish I had done more.


Managers

M_small Graham Filler

Cigar_small Jonathan Franz

Bama_hawkeye_small Bama Hawkeye

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Editors

Wrigleymarquee_small Hilary Lee

Authors

Small Chadnudj

Img-20101223-00043_small JDMill

Afudyfycaae-oai_jpg_large_small MSULaxer27

Small Paterno Ave

Smokecrop_small babaoreally

Sherman_sea_1868_small KennardHusker