Who Killed the Big Twelve?
Because oneupsmanship will get you everywhere...
(WARNING! SATIRE AHEAD! PROCEED WITH CAUTION!)
There are teams in college football that make me sick. Most SEC squads do the trick when they go unbeaten. Ohio State occasionally makes me sick to my stomach (especially after the UW-OSU game in 2008). Penn State can do it (thanks for slaughtering the worst Wisconsin team since 2001, guys).
Other teams just make me mad. Notre Dame comes in no matter how they perform. Florida also. But no team can get my goat like the Texas Longhorns.
After the jump:explaining my disgust for the Texas Longhorns... And just take the Shotgun Kiss from the media...
Why does Texas make me mad? Well, let's see here. They get hugely favorable matchups in their postseason games, such as the 2006 Alamo Bowl (which Iowa fans have fond memories of, I'm sure), the 2008 Holiday Bowl, and the 2009 Fiesta Bowl.
The 2006 Alamo Bowl featured a reeling Iowa squad vs. the "invincible" Texas Longhorns. Iowa put up a terrific contest, but came up two points short against the immortal Colt McCoy.
The 2007 Holiday Bowl brought in Pac Ten "co-champions" Arizona State and Big Twelve South runner-up Texas. Texas ran away with the game in the first quarter, scoring 21 unanswered points en route to their third* consecutive bowl win.
(* = I'm arbitrarily discounting the 2005 Rose Bowl, better defined as one of the worst Big Ten champions in recent memory blowing yet ANOTHER Rose Bowl. One of the participating teams had to whine its way in. Sorry, whining into Rose Bowls is NOT allowed under OBrienSchofieldismyHero's definition* of the BCS)
((* = It's a flawed definition, to be certain. Michigan isn't allowed in either, but that's another story.))
Finally, the 2009 Fiesta Bowl. I'm absolutely certain the media crowned Texas the winners before the opening kickoff. Ohio State wasn't supposed to compete.
Wrong. They did. The Buckeyes pulled every trick in the book to try and beat the Longhorns. Then someone felt it would be a great idea to go for two after the touchdowns that put the Buckeyes on top. Not such a great idea, guys, because it didn't work either time. (It is also *highly* inadvisable to give up a rushing TD to the opposing QB, but that never stopped 2008 Wisconsin OR 2008 Ohio State from doing it...)
Finally, the play that secured Anderson Russell as the worst safety in Ohio State history (something he has NOT been able to disprove, sadly). The play that finally gave the Longhorns their much deserved win. McCoy to Cosby. Game over.
No, it wasn't game over. Todd Boeckman trotted out, dropped back and was SACKED. Now, its game over. Now, the media crowns Texas. If not for Florida beating OU, Texas would have been National Champions. Wouldn't they?
The next season comes along. Longhorn partisans remember their great victory over the Buckeyes. They are ranked #2 in the polls, a position they are able to keep for almost the entire season (until SEC teams run their course and annihilate each other in the championship game). There's no running game. Colt McCoy is their leading rusher.
Now, let me stop here. Texas's offense would not have worked in the Big Ten. Why? Because in the late games, it gets COLD when you go on the road. Evanston, Madison, Iowa City, even Minneapolis become frigid. It is not possible to drop back 50-60 times and complete 30-45. It's just not going to happen (unless you're Northwestern, in which case such pinball offensive scenarios are expected). When your QB is your leading rusher, you are in BIG trouble in the Big Ten.
(random stoppage over)
Texas makes it easily to the Big Twelve Championship Game. It isn't even close in their division. OU is gutted by injuries, but still fields a great defense. Texas A&M alternates between blowing out opponents and getting blown out. Baylor is torpedoed by a QB ACL injury in a win over creampuff Northwestern State. Texas Tech goes from highly touted to also ran with back to back losses to UT and Houston (and a whole bunch of others). Oklahoma State is sunk by Dez Bryant not knowing what to say to the NCAA (and the lack of any discernable defense, and a loss to Houston)
Texas passes away from their division, because they haven't found a replacement for Jamaal Charles (they're still looking, by the way). They then come to Nebraska.
Instead of beating the tar out of the Cornhuskers, the Longhorns are shut down offensively. Nebraska doesn't have any offense, but takes the lead with FOUR field goals. A gut-wrenching affair comes down to the final drive. A bad penalty is involved. A defensive breakdown happens. Colt McCoy makes perhaps the dumbest decision since Allan Evri*ge thought Malcolm Jenkins was a Badger: he throws the ball out of bounds. Now, why'd he do that? He should have spiked the bloody football so there'd be no controversy. Fool.
The game is over right? Wrong. Texas gets an unbelievably favorable call that allows them to trot out the field goal team. Hunter Lawrence nails it. Texas goes to Pasadena, Bo Pelini goes bonkers, and the media firestorm begins anew.
Texas has a ridiculous run defense. In hindsight, the run defense NEVER faced an accomplished running team. But at the time, ESPN talked and talked and talked about how amazing Texas's run defense was. How could Alabama hope to compete?
Imagine the following scenario. Your QB, who has anchored your team to all this success, is injured. He cannot feel his throwing arm. He cannot throw the football. In the meantime, your hideously overrated run defense gets absolutely destroyed by the Heisman Trophy winner and his best friend.
It isn't much of a contest. Alabama slaughters Texas until Jordan Shipley remembers that he can be a pretty good receiver when he wants to be. Texas is able to make it close, but they can't pull off the incredible. Alabama is able to get five turnovers: Four INTs, and a royal doozy of a fumble recovery for a TD.
Texas's bubble is burst. Colt McCoy is gone. Jordan Shipley is gone. Many components of their (overrated) defense are gone. Shouldn't they be moderately ranked this season? 10th to 20th range?
No. Texas is ranked in the top ten. Despite losing its best receiver. Despite having their best defensive players leave for the NFL. Despite losing their "wiinningest" QB.
To add to all of this, they torpedo their own conference in the offseason by hinting that they'd like an additional share of media revenue, perhaps their own network, coming across as unspeakably greedy in the process. I hate Texas even more than I did when I started this...
(Final Note: They cancelled their series with Minnesota. Hmph.)
Now, in my semblance of trying to weave all of this together, which Big Ten team would you like to see Texas play this season?
(SATIRE ENDS HERE)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Iowa, only if the Iowa home game was
in late October or November. I would love…love to see Texas, USC, or anyone from the SEC come up North in November.
"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."
I'm voting Minnesota
mainly because that’s the one that they should have honored.
It never gets to be easy
Unfortunately, if Minnesota doesn't drastically improve across the board, Texas could probably swat them ala 2008 Iowa...
On the other hand, there is such a phrase as “dark years”. Remember when the Hawkeyes were the worst team in the Big Twelve North and the Big Ten? It didn’t last, because Ferentz proved he could turn average recruits into All Big Ten selections and win with those players. The Spartans and the Wildcats both went through down phases (the tragic death of Randy Walker and the highly forgettable tenure of Coach John L.). Michigan is in one RIGHT NOW. Illinois has been in a funk for the past decade (but they will come out olf nowhere to upend the Buckeyes). Indiana’s entire existence has been a dark phase.
But Mack Brown is NOT the John Wooden of college football (who could field title winners right and left, and get his team far in the tournament in the off years). He’s going to hit a huge down year at some point. Cooper did in 1999. Alvarez in 2001. Ferentz in 1999-2000. Miami in 2007. Florida State last year. The question is…when will Texas hit the downslope?
My kingdom for a spellchecker...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 1, 2010 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions
Ferentz didn't "hit" a down year
In 1999 or 2000….those were the “late Fry” teams who couldn’t find their own endzone to save their own lives. That said, 2006-7 was Iowa’s down year, no doubt about it (although the year before that wasn’t that great either).
That said, I’m of the opinion that Texas has enough recruiting clout and pent-up power that they can weather a “down year” and reload, rather than rebuild, as the saying goes, much in the way that Ohio State and Michigan do does. So in other words, never mind, you’re right.
Me gustan los estados unidos.
I think too much is being made of that
With the Texas Ten moving to a 9 game schedule, they were going to back out of either the Minni series or the Cal series; no one except Pac 10 12 teams will play 11 games against BCS AQ / ND teams in this era. And really, it’s probably better that they play Cal (who might win) than Minni (who won’t).
I'm not arguing that Minnesota would or wouldn't win
I’m simply saying that I hate seeing any school back out of an agreement, even if it wasn’t finalized, to play another BCS school. Especially when it all seems to be related to UTs greed about video distribution (unless I completely mis-understood).
It never gets to be easy
by chitownhawkeye on Aug 2, 2010 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I guess...
I just think either the Cal series or the Minni series was doomed once it became clear the Texas Ten was going to a 9-game schedule (absolute best case would be rescheduling it), and as an impartial fan on this one, I’d rather see Cal/Texas played than Minni/Texas. The TV rights squabble was just an excuse.
The Big Twelve is going to the round robin that the media hated
And the Pac-12 is going to the division alignment that the Big Twelve loved.
Um, is something completely WRONG with this picture?
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 3, 2010 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I voted for Iowa
Solely because I’m a vengeful sonofabitch, and I want some payback for 2006. That said, I don’t want to have to play them when the team is down (as Iowa’s down years will likely be worse than Texas’).
Me gustan los estados unidos.
Take this as a consolation: In Iowa's dark years, they can still come within two points of a Texas team that lost to K-State.
That didn’t sound right, did it? I tried…
My kingdom for a spellchecker...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 1, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't take me back to those dark years
/curls up in fetal position/
I don’t wanna go back, I DON’T WANNA!
Me gustan los estados unidos.
K-State ANNIHILATED Texas the next year.
Heck, that game might be why Jordy Nelson is in the NFL today…
Before the game, Texas had never given up a punt, kick, and INT return for a TD in the same season under Mack Brown. After the game, they had done all THREE.
One possible reason why Ron Prince might be a good head coach at some talent-starved rock in the middle of nowhere (EMU or NMSU)
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
Fire KP! He forgot to turn off injuries in dynasty mode. - by Norsktroll on BlazersEdge
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 6, 2010 2:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Some random thoughts about that game
- It was the first time all season where Iowa scored on their first possesion.
-Iowa had a touchdown called back when Scott Chandler was lined up approx. three inches too far to the right. It would have made the score 21-7. Tate threw a pick on the next play, and the whorns went down the field and tied it up.
-Schlicher missed a relatively easy field goal.
-On Iowa’s final possesion, KOK called a ridiculous reverse that ended up going nowhere. What made it worse was that he called on the first play of the possesion, when Iowa all ready had the ball at midfield.
This
On Iowa’s final possesion, KOK called a ridiculous reverse that ended up going nowhere.
Classic KOK. That play was stupifyingly bad and unnecessary. Besides, it fit neither his or Ferentz’s philosophies. He just outthought himself. I like to think of it as he channeled his inner Fry.
Relatively easy field goals...
Oh yeah, Philip Welch misses those all the time. It’s super annoying.
My kingdom for a spellchecker...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 1, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Between 2005 and 2006
Shlicher missed three field goals in games that Iowa would go on to lose. Michigan in 2005, NW in 2005, and then the Alamo Bowl that I’ve mentioned. He also missed one against Wisconsin in 2006, but it’s hard to count that one because it was from 50+ yards, and at the end of the 1st half.
Those two misses in 2005 are a big reason why Ferentz doesn’t really consider that year to be a disappointment, at least not when it’s compared to 2006 and 2007.
Formation penalties like that one deserve a painful end.
That also happened in the infamous Wisconsin-Michigan game in 2008. Travis Beckum was somehow called for that penalty; the two point conversion was invalidated and Evr*de threw the next attempt out of the endzone.
Worst. Penalty. EVER. It would have tied the game 27-27…
My kingdom for a spellchecker. Or Devin Harris. Hopefully both.
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 2, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm still upset at the last play of the Big 12 Championship game
it should’ve been intentional grounding and called a sack. Texas’ TE was covered by the WR (who was clearly breaking the plane of the center’s waist). McCoy didn’t get outside the TE (who is now the boundary of the “tackle box”) when he threw it out, therefore it is intentional grounding, sack, game over.
What upsets me most is that nobody even talked about it after the game, people only talked about the whole one second thing.
Idle talk and hollow promises; cheating Judases; doubting Thomases
That's because the Pelini brothers weren't throwing hissy fits over intentional grounding
And because, let’s be honest, how often do refs actually extend the tackle box to include the TE in situations like that? Whether or not it’s the technically correct call, how often does it get made?
Almost never...
Usually, you KNOW when the QB has committed intentional grounding.
A spike is NOT intentional grounding. Colt McCoy is an idiot for not spiking the football and ensuring there’d be one second left. There’d also be no controversy (or as the BBC says, contravasy)
My kingdom for a spellchecker...
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Aug 1, 2010 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions

by 





























