Looking At The Tressel/Ohio State Situation
'Bama Hawkeye has done a great bullet point rundown/prediction of what's going on along the banks of the Olentangy, and so I'll leave my predictions for any additional punishment, if there's going to be any, over there. I want to get to the heart of what's going on in Columbus, and there are really only two possible answers that can come out of this if you're being intellectually honest with yourself.
Neither one is good for the Ohio State football program.
As I was watching the press conference last night, and the facts started coming out, I listened with great interest as the story unfolded:
Jim Tressel was notified in April of 2010 that there was a federal investigation in drug trafficking, and his players might be involved. Wh-wh-WHAT?!?!?!?!
You didn't run full speed like someone was chasing you to Gene Smith's office to let him know? A federal drug trafficking investigation, and it was ho-hum, just another day at the Woody Hayes Athletic Complex??? That's another story in and of itself, if that was his genuine reaction.
But okay, let's play along.
So, Tressel's excuse is that he didn't notify the NCAA because the Feds trump the NCAA. Fair point. Okay, so far, I can buy this. And if there's no proof of wrongdoing, do you sit guys without anything other than a single email?
Debatable, but I can see both sides of the argument here. But then, it's revealed that the drug investigation isn't about your players, but the tattoo shop that the investigation was centered on has given OSU players that have gone there ink for some of their memorabilia, the players sold them other memorabilia, and well, that story is well published.
Whew! That's all? That's almost cause for celebration, baby!!
I can buy the argument that the Feds take precedence over the NCAA...hell, I'm one of the few non-lawyers on this site and even I know that, and if the Feds tell you something (and by looking at the emails, it wasn't a US attorney that gave him the info, but a guy that knew about the investigation) and tell you to keep it quiet, one would think that you would.
Now here's where Tressel's creditability goes in the tank. I understand not picking up the phone and calling the NCAA when you get this bundle of joy, but not calling...anyone?
Because what Jim Tressel wants us to believe, near as I can tell, is that he got an email that said:
"Coach, you have players that are under federal investigation for drug trafficking because they're also getting free ink and selling memorabilia at this place we're investigating. Just thought you might want to know, but keep this under wraps.
And all Tressel did was send an email back that essentially says:
"okay, thanks for the info. Keep me posted."
Seriously? SERIOUSLY??
In Tressel's defense, my first reaction wouldn't be to call the NCAA, either. But I sure as Holy Hell would call, at a minimum, the legal department and the AD to see how to proceed. For the legal minds on here, please weigh in if I'm off base, but even if it was a Fed (which I don't think it was) that was telling him to 'keep it quiet', he would still be well within his rights to reach out to the University legal office and the AD, his immediate supervisor. I would go even further and say he has an obligation to, would he not?
So with that, there are only two logical conclusions that we can come to reagarding Tressel's decision making in this matter.
1. He thought he was genuinely doing the right thing by not saying anything about players that he knew were violating NCAA rules, because it was part of an ongoing federal investigation...that the OSU legal department and AD Gene Smith didn't need to be bothered about.
2. Jim Tressel is no different than any other coach, and all his talk about doing the right thing even when no one is looking can be trumped when you have a team many people think are serious national title contenders and you have an overriding desire to win.
Well, it isn't #1.
I was exchanging emails with a Michigan friend of mine, and he asked me how I felt about the whole thing, and if I was surprised. And I have to say the cynical side of me isn't. He said he was 'stunned' that this happened to Tressel, because he really thought he was different, but "I guess no one is without vulnerability, even the well respected and straight shooting Jim Tressel."
As much as we like to think we're different in the Big Ten, it's still big time college football, and the pressure to win means that you could probably go to 115 DI schools and find some kind of violation, recruiting or otherwise, but make no mistake, I'm not saying that to try and minimize what happened here.
I'm just saying that to say that no, I'm not stunned, and I'm not even surprised.
But I am very, very disappointed.
In the end, winning apparently does trump doing what's right.
When I was in the Army (Oh Jesus, here we go) we had a saying that one 'aw shit' cancels out 1,000 'attaboys'.
I can't think of a more appropriate application of this saying than right here, right now.
109 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You are, unfortunately, correct
After removing my scarlet-and-grey-colored glasses, I came to a similar conclusion. His story — at least as explained in the self-report and the press conference — just doesn’t hold water. As I wrote elsewhere, surely he’s not so dense as to think he couldn’t talk with a lawyer and still maintain confidentiality. And since he admittedly did not know what to do but knew it was a potential violation that would eventually become known, I don’t see how a rational actor chooses to continue concealment. And even if he somehow thought concealment initially was the right course of action, why was he staying quiet in December? The federal investigation at that point was public, the players’ names were already in the press, there was no benefit to be had from concealment except a nefarious one.
What???
So, Tressel’s excuse is that he didn’t notify the NCAA because the Feds trump the NCAA. Fair point.
Fair point? There is no documentation to support this. None. Under law, A.K.A. his contract, he should have immediately reported this to the compliance office/NCAA. There is no excusing this infraction regardless of what colored glasses you wear. People need to quit making excuses and examine the facts available, regardless of what teams we are fans of.
And all Tressel did was send an email back that essentially says:
“okay, thanks for the info. Keep me posted.”
Misleading. ‘ASAP’ isn’t a thanks for the info type response.
but even if it was a Fed (which I don’t think it was) that was telling him to ‘keep it quiet’
Again misleading. The April 2nd email makes no mention of it being confidential, not until the April 16th email does the person state that ‘What I tell you is confidential’. This is you spinning things to make JT look at least decent. Again, just stick with the facts. There is no documentation for him to keep it quiet, only an email in which an ‘informant’ if you will, says keep my name out of this.
When I was in the Army
When I was in the Army my platoon sergeant used to say, “You’re only as good as your last fuck up”.
I’m sick of this being spun one way or another. It isn’t good, no matter how you spin it. What is to be determined is the repercussions of the NCAA investigation. It is a black eye to all the B1G no matter the spin.
by Grixxly on Mar 9, 2011 5:07 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Not trying to spin it to Tressel's favor
And I was rebutting what Tressel essentially said in the press conference last night.
It’s stupefying to me that he got an email that has that kind of potentially explosive info in it, and he says he didn’t say anything because the feds take precedence over the NCAA. It’s ridiculous all the way around.
At minimum, he should’ve contacted the AD and the legal department immediately and gotten some guidance on what to do.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
Then I read your post wrong
I seriously hate this and wish something solid would come out about Newton so the spotlight would go elsewhere. Regardless I don’t think this ends well.
I will completely disagree on your stance
that this is a “black eye to all the” Big Ten. This is a black eye to Ohio State, and does not tarnish the image of Purdue, Minnesota, Penn State, Northwestern, etc.
Luring recruits with my new "Posting HD" scheme since '08.
Kills me to say it, but wrong
For college football fans outside Big Ten Country (especially those lovely tree poisoning people in the SEC), Ohio State carries the flag for the Big Ten. They have for the last decade. Six straight BCS games and 3 natty title game appearances will do that. B1G fans were all up in arms about how the SEC cheats with oversigning (which they do), but now the South’s rebuttal will be "well your supposed fine, upstanding, “Senator” is a liar and a cheater too". Fair or not, from a national perspective Ohio State has been the face of the B1G lately, and this indeed gives a big ol’ shiner to the reputation of the entire conference.
The Daily Gopher
by Jeffrick on Mar 10, 2011 9:19 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
There is no logic to this argument. The actions of a completely autonomous football program cannot be projected onto other programs simply due to a shared conference allegiance. The reason why the SEC is labeled as a group of cheaters is precisely because the large majority of programs cheat, and more often than not. Once incident by one coach at one Big Ten school does not smudge the reputation one bit of the programs of Indiana, Wisconsin, and, being a complete homer, Penn State. And let’s be honest here. Is there anyone, other than Generic Buckeye Fan, that didn’t suspect some rule bending in Columbus over the last decade? I refuse to accept the position that Ohio State is the model of the ideal Big Ten program and that any transgression by that program condemns the rest of them.
As a fan of a program in this conference, I’ll be damned if I ever give such an argument any validity, particularly to an SEC knobber. They can think that OSU being dirty stains the rest of us, just like they can think oversigning is acceptable, but I won’t ever give those stances an ounce of legitimacy.
Luring recruits with my new "Posting HD" scheme since '08.
Unfortunately, perception is reality for a lot of people
Especially those looking to bash the B1G.
The Daily Gopher
Ohio State besmirching Penn State's integrity
Would be like saying Auburn besmirches Vanderbilt.
Dirty teams are dirty teams, and the majority of teams in the SEC have dirt on them at an individual level. That’s why people associate them with a lack of integrity. That and a conference-wide policy of loose enforcement on oversigning that about half the schools take advantage of.
by OctaShields on Mar 10, 2011 11:41 AM CST up reply actions
Consider the fact that Notre Dame fired a head coach for misstating a line on his resume.
There is a huge discrepancy in the character and integrity of the people who are in charge at schools like Ohio State. There is a reason kids like Maurice Claurette and other young men of very questionable character find themselves at OSU. It’s a good fit.
by Disinterested Par-tay on Mar 9, 2011 5:17 PM CST reply actions
massengill
HELP IS ON THE WAY
http://www.insidetheshoe.com/
by SouthBayBuckeye on Mar 9, 2011 5:18 PM CST up reply actions
This kind of shit does nothing for the conversation
In fact it makes you look like a douche as stated below.
The truth can be a bitch.
Conspicuously absent in your replies is any reference to my comment being untrue.
by Disinterested Par-tay on Mar 9, 2011 5:32 PM CST up reply actions
Then what is the conversation about?
I disagree. I think this conversation is about integrity. I think the fact that Ohio State’s living messiah has been caught in a bald-faced lie and the university, its alumni and its fans seem to accept it as "part of the deal" speaks volumes about the exceedingly low character of those affiliated with tOSU. You may not want to discuss it, but that is the issue.
by Disinterested Par-tay on Mar 9, 2011 5:45 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think any OSU fan wants to accept it as 'part of the deal'
What Tressel did really can’t be defended, but to swipe a broad brush and say everyone affiliated with the program—to include the alumni and fans—has low character is one of the more patently asinine arguments I’ve seen posted on here, and makes you come off as a bigger jackass than Tressel.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
The conversation is about
What has been released about a particular incident. Feel free to start a fanpost about integrity. But this thread, as stated by the OP is about a particular subject. I dislike OSU immensely, however I’d prefer to stay on topic.
It's your dumbass opinion.
Maurice Clarett went to OSU because he was a 5-star running back from Ohio and in case you didn’t know, 1) Ohio State is in Ohio and 2) Ohio State has a good football program, perhaps you’ve heard of it? I would imagine Clarett wanted to stay at home and play for a respected football school; he didn’t go to Ohio State because they were going to let him get away with his bullshit (because, if you remember, OSU kicked his dumb ass off the team once he screwed up). Plus, do you think OSU had any idea Mighty Mo was going to be a headache? He had no prior record and there was no reason to believe he would do anything dumb. But you know, knowing stuff is hard.
Also, Notre Dame’s current coach made an extremely reckless and dangerous decision to send a student 30 feet into the air during a wind storm, which cost the kid his life, and then he failed to take responsibility, and he still has a job, so your entire argument is null and void.
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
by Jon Ross on Mar 9, 2011 5:42 PM CST up reply actions 4 recs
Thanks for your valuable insight.
The issue is integrity. Your example of a very regrettable decision that unfortunately led to the death of a student is a far cry from a coach knowing that student athletes committed NCAA violations and doing nothing. But you know, knowing stuff is hard. Especially when your educational experience (assuming you actually attended tOSU) teaches that character has no place in coaching young men.
And since you want to pretend to be a lawyer, learn the difference between an intentional act to decieve and a bad decision.
by Disinterested Par-tay on Mar 9, 2011 5:55 PM CST up reply actions
You tried to make the Notre Dame has more integrity than OSU point.
I was refuting it. If Notre Dame had “integrity” they would have fired Brian Kelly, without a doubt. I’m not saying Jim Tressel did the right thing, but Notre Dame is a bad example to prove your point.
I’m not disagreeing with you that Jim Tressel made a bad decision that reflects poorly on his character, and if OSU fired him they would be justified. But I am disagreeing with you that Notre Dame, as you claim, is the picture of moral authority.
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
by Jon Ross on Mar 9, 2011 6:03 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Because of Jesus!
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
Just so we're clear
you are a Notre Dame fan and a Boston Red Sox fan? Please dine on a bullet.
by Onestatewest on Mar 10, 2011 10:28 AM CST up reply actions
Intentional Act to Deceive:
Notre Dame fan talking up a Sun Bowl win as ‘Notre Dame being back’
Bad decision: Cheering for Notre Dame.
I think that clears it up, does it not?
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
by Ted Glover on Mar 10, 2011 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
That was an easy rec to give.
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 10, 2011 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
And even if you grant him this...
1. He thought he was genuinely doing the right thing by not saying anything about players that he knew were violating NCAA rules, because it was part of an ongoing federal investigation…that the OSU legal department and AD Gene Smith didn’t need to be bothered about.
He still kept his mouth shut once the FEDS told OSU about the investigation in December. I mean, you have to suspend a lot of rational thought to believe he was right to never tell anyone by the time December rolled around. But once the feds are telling you about the investigation what is there to keep secret anymore? In the end, even the most generous interpretation of the timeline has Tressel lying (by omission) to his compliance dept and the NCAA in December. Unless of course neither of them ever asked the question “Had you previously heard anything about these infractions” (or something similar) during the December investigation. And somehow I doubt that’s the case.
And
He signed a document in September saying he didn’t know of any NCAA infractions.
Really Jim? Really??
It’s just so disappointing, on so many levels.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
Really? REALLY?
![]()
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
by Jon Ross on Mar 9, 2011 5:52 PM CST up reply actions 6 recs
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!

Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 9, 2011 6:47 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Are those shorts or boxers?
Did we really used to wear things like that?
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
It was the 80s...
Surely you remember the Earle Bruce years…
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 9, 2011 6:59 PM CST up reply actions
With fondness
You could set your clock to 9-3 with a good bowl.
Kind of a lost decade of football for the state of Wisconsin, no?
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
Consdering the sheer suckitude of the 1970s
the 1980s were a much needed improvement.
Then came the Don Morton era, where Wisconsin won 3 conference games in 3 years.
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 9, 2011 7:27 PM CST up reply actions
At least we had the Instant Replay game. And we did what the BYU honor code couldn’t and broke Jim McMahon in half.
by Ricardo Efendi on Mar 10, 2011 8:26 AM CST up reply actions
I rec'd it
and T-Glove is the only fOSU fan I know who has actually referenced Earle Bruce
"GO HAWKS!" - only cure for Hawkeye Envy
by BentNotBroken on Mar 9, 2011 7:02 PM CST up reply actions
I never had an issue with Earle
Well, I thought he lost at least one game a year he had no business losing, but hey, it is what it is.
Earle’s problem was that he was The Guy That Followed Woody, and Jesus Christ would have had a tough time not having a sizeable amount of the fanbase dislike him just for that reason alone.
He was 5-3 in bowl games, 5-3 against Michigan, and won one of the more famous games in the rivalry…the ‘Earle Headband’ game. A woefully inferior OSU team won for their coach in AA after it was announced earlier in the week that he was out as the coach after one disappointing season.
Earle’s always been overlooked, which is kind of a shame.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
Earle does not get enough credit.
Considering who followed him…
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 9, 2011 9:58 PM CST up reply actions
Can we talk about basketball? Please? PLEASE? We're No. 1! PLEEEAAASEEE?
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
ha
i’ll see what i’ve got
Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Graham Filler on Mar 9, 2011 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
My only problem is this
As much as we like to think we’re different in the Big Ten, it’s still big time college football, and the pressure to win means that you could probably go to 115 DI schools and find some kind of violation, recruiting or otherwise, but make no mistake, I’m not saying that to try and minimize what happened here.
I take umbrige with this only because I can’t remember the last time anyone other than OSU screwed up something this bad with the NCAA. The Rich Rodriguez practicing thing maybe but even then it isn’t like Michigan has a long history of offenses.
As a league, we certainly all make mistakes. However it would be interesting for someone to study how many NCAA violations Ohio State has had in the past decade compared to the rest of the conference. Perhaps it is because they are a bigger insitution and get more publicity but I feel like Ohio State has certainly gotten busted for NCAA violations a lot more recently than the rest of us.
Note, I am referring to NCAA violation here. Drug/alcohol charges are different because they don’t impact a school’s ability to win (and if they do it is almost never in a positive way) and are variable depending on how much athlete’s can get away with in a specific area. If someone wants to do a study on that as well though be my guest.
I am not saying Ohio State is dirty either, I just feel like some research should be done on the subject so we have a barometer to judge by. If we could find a reasonable way to determine what constitutes a major NCAA infraction (i.e. something they will actually hand out a fairly substantial punishment for) and then compare the Big Ten I think it would put this in a lot more perspective rather than look at this with blanket assertions like “oh they’re a dirty program” or “everybody does the same thing” because the limited evidence we have now really doesn’t support either of those.
http://victorypolka.blogspot.com/
Don't take this the wrong way,
but it’s kind of convenient that a Hawkeye fan says ‘hey, let’s not talk about drug or alcohol issues when discussing dirty laundry’, lol. It’s like Minnesota trying to argue supremacy over Iowa by making you discount things like recent series ‘wins’.
’cept 2010, ahem. :)
Anyway, moving on.
And I made that statement not so much as a damning indictment of individual programs, but because of the ridiculously archaic rules the NCAA has set forth, and how it seems like it’s damn near next to impossible to NOT commit some sort of violation, regardless of how good a school’s compliance program is.
I mean, is it really wrong for a kid to sell something that is his own property, regardless of how much sentimental value fans and alumni place on those items? But that’s another post for another day.
This isn’t that, though. This was a pretty serious violation of a well known rule, and to say that Jim Tressel didn’t know he was doing something wrong is foolish.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
we can talk drugs all we want, thats pretty relevant
but im not really gonna fault any school for drinking problems, everyone in college drinks, in my college, in my sisters and brothers college, everyone drinks. and the way i see it, when it comes to college drinking its just a matter of if the police look for it or not, or end up calling charges on it or not
fact is, if your on scholorship and the school says not to do something, you should just not do it. you cant wait 4 years to sell it? you cant get a job like everyone else?
by justsomehawkeyefan on Mar 9, 2011 7:19 PM CST up reply actions
They have a job, it's playing football and going to class, there isn't any time for a job. Hell, I hardly have time for a job, and I only play intramural sports lol.
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
you should tell that to my friends who somehow magically do all three
is it hard? yeah, life is hard. get a summer job when your only doing practices, if your even doing those. work nights. ive seen it done before. and most of those guys are on scholorship so they dont have to make as much money, or better yet work before you go to college and save up a lot of money like i did.
and really, its not like these guys were buying school supplies, they were getting tats. they didnt need those tats.
by justsomehawkeyefan on Mar 9, 2011 7:30 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't say it wasn't hard. But it is naive to believe that football players can just get a job. They literally spend 45 hours a week on football, in addition to however much time they spend on school-work.
Where is Terrelle Pryor going to find the time to work 25 (part-time) hours? That doesn’t mean he should sell his shit, but he also shouldn’t be expected to have a job either.
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
I believe Collin Kaepernick (spl?) worked at a department store last year
And i know a lot of the recruits at Iowa (Polish Hat was one of them) worked on cleaning Kinnick this summer.
I am with you it is hard but it isn’t impossible. If the OSU AD could find a way to create job opportunities (within the scope of the NCAA) for players it might work.
http://victorypolka.blogspot.com/
Hawks. Drugs. Alcohol. Me.
This tattoo-gate has elicited a range of reactions. First, elation – fOSU FINALLY got caught. Then, defensive – B1G operations no way compare to the Busch League SEC football ways. Now… uncertainty – B1G towns are notorious for hangabouts and ne’er-do-wells. I couldn’t imagine what messages j tress’s inbox receives daily(knowing the interwebz).
"GO HAWKS!" - only cure for Hawkeye Envy
by BentNotBroken on Mar 9, 2011 7:27 PM CST up reply actions
Ted, you're comparing apples and oranges.
If you want to air dirty laundry, to include misdemeanor drug and alcohol convictions, fine. Major infractions committed by the head coach as he lied or misled his own compliance department, AD, and ignored the opportunity to talk to the lawyers for tOSU about this? Entirely different ball of wax.
by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Mar 9, 2011 7:43 PM CST up reply actions
Word, NPAT.
Word.
No one has shit on KF for sitting on DJKDEA moves.
I don’t get how OSU admin feel legit that their headfootballcoach didnt know he was CONTRACTUALLY obligated to disclose emails just like the ones .comville has shown me sweatyvest to have received.
"GO HAWKS!" - only cure for Hawkeye Envy
by BentNotBroken on Mar 9, 2011 7:54 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, I know
But I’m doing anything to try and forget what’s going on in Columbus. Taking a jab at Iowa is therapy.
So is drinking.
/takes big pull off of Jack Daniels bottle
/mutters incoherently about Iowa
/laughs to no one in particular
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
by Ted Glover on Mar 9, 2011 7:54 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
That was great
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Mar 10, 2011 9:46 AM CST up reply actions
Feels so good....

When we get the Pig, the Jug and the Axe, we'll have one hell of a picnic
by Marshmoose on Mar 10, 2011 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Enjoy Floyd for a year
He’ll come back to his natural home (the original Floyd was from Iowa)
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Mar 10, 2011 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
We'll see
We filled our upset trophy quota for the next few years, so the heat is off. The wild card is we’re finally rid of Brewster. That man managed to be the MVP of every team we played
When we get the Pig, the Jug and the Axe, we'll have one hell of a picnic
RIP Brew
You and your TRY. FIGHT. FAIL. will be missed
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Mar 10, 2011 10:57 AM CST up reply actions
Sort of like John Cooper is sorely missed on the Michigan sideline?
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 10, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
What I want to see id Wetzel and his cronies to do their next “investigation” on an SEC school. Then I want to see them do one on the ACC (Duke) …. and on down the line to Miami of Ohio.
I’d bet that every exhaustive investigation that they undertake will come up with multiple violations for each and every one of those schools.
But Yahoo currently has an ax to grind with USC and now OSU. They will always target these types of schools because of the name recognition. A headline that reads Coach X at Toledo lied to investigators will get them very few hits and no new revenue for tha almighty $$.
Difference is
U$C has historically committed major violations, and the NCAA hasn’t done anything. Why they haven’t forfeited almost every season in living memory is…ridiculous.
And yes, I hate U$C with a passion. Why do you ask?
Editor at BT Powerhouse, a Big Ten Basketball blog.
Author at Acme Packing Company, a Green Bay Packers blog
Fighting the Battle of Who Could Care Less since 12/29/09
by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Mar 9, 2011 7:41 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe, whatever, who cares.
I don’t care what sort of texting violations Miami U. is committing this year.
This is about an elite program potentially playing, knowingly, ineligible athletes. That’s like West Texas, circa 1958.
I just don’t believe this story. I cannot believe Tressel, especially after Clarrett, is this dumb. Man, what do you suppose happens if one of the athletes was coached by someone working for OSU, in how to keep stuff quiet until the season was over? Whoa.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
I don’t care what sort of texting violations Miami U. is committing this year.
This is not what I am talking about. If anyone hired a private investigator to actually dig into some of the booster/player relationships at any school, Big10, SEC, PAC10 … it doesn’t matter, I am fairly confident that each and every school would have major violations.
I really doubt that's true
It’s just a convenient generalizaiton that is impossible to verify and has the feel of “truthiness” that is trotted out by the fanbase of whichever team just got busted for breaking the rules.
The not sitting the players is incidental. The real big problem for OSU here is the fact that Tressel received information from a credible source that, if true, indicated some of his players were ineligible and then DID NOTHING. The sin here is that Tressel didn’t dig, didn’t want to know the truth and seems to have tried to bury it.
I ate the blue ones ... they taste like burning.
My opinion was of that nature 5 years ago when the USC stuff started up, it didn’t materialize just because Tressel f’ed up.
I’ve always thought big time college football has pay for play schemes. Heck, that’s how it was done in the 50s and 60s. It just isn’t as publicly blatant as it used to be. But I am fairly confindent it happens at most schools, even the smaller schools. (I’ve seen some of it at an FCS school)
Pay for play is also a pretty vague term
It’d be hard to believe that there is ANY school that hasn’t had at least one kid getting some kind of illegal benefit from a booster, fan, etc. There’s only so much a program can police if an agent, booster, or fan wants to contact or provide some benefit to a player.
That being said, it’s illegal. Schools are supposed to take affirmative steps to make sure it’s not going on. I think SOME schools either explicitly or implicitly engage in pay for play, where the program knows it’s going on and probably even facilitates it through middlemen or whatever. Or if it’s an agent providing benefits, the school just kind of whistles past the graveyard when he shows up driving a new Escalade and doesn’t ask how that’s possible.
THESE SCHOOLS are the ones who need to be punished, because they are either directly violating or facilitating the violation of NCAA rules to gain a competitive advantage. The schools where a random player or two gets contacted by rogue boosters or agents and gets impermissible benefits without the knowledge of the program is a little less at fault, though they still need to monitor their kids to make sure this isn’t happening to C their own A.
I would agree that a lot of schools have kids who get some kind of impermissible benefit, but to say a lot of schools engage in pay for play travels to a realm I don’t feel comfortable entering. I think some schools do, and I hope they get caught, but most make serious efforts to avoid those situations and might only have an isolated incident every now and then.
What I don't get...
Is every offseason we get top billing in the local papers, we being the larger SEC programs, for having multiple secondary violations… aka big scary words used to get hits and continue whatever narrative the local paper has going at the time.
If I can’t avoid finding out that Georgia committed 4 secondary violations without hiding in a cave… then how in the world can OSU’s NCAA record 370ish secondary violations go completely unnoticed by most of the college football world?
Seriously, I’d kill for a local paper that wasn’t constantly trying to play gotcha with our AD.
It's the school as a whole, not just the football team.
"Carrie, I can't go in there, I'm claustrophobic."
"Well, It's gonna' be a rough half hour for ya then."
-Doug Heffernan coming to grips with the cold reality of an MRI machine
Two questions,
but first, getting busted for possession of beer while underage but just sorta maybe sticking out in a small town called Iowa City, rife with wound-up cops, because you’re 6’7" and 280?, is an offense that Jim Tressel wishes he were dealing with — right after he pulls all those strings to get a neighbor off on a jaywalking ticket.
We’re talking about something a little more troubling, with this obstruction of NCAA justice thing. Honestly, Tressel is so buttoned up I cannot understand it. It’s like reading in the morning papers that he hasn’t paid his taxes in five years. You could knock me over, similarly, if you told me that Ferentz had an Oxy problem. Or that Doyle sent 13 guys to dialysis …. well, maybe not that. I was already knocked over by that.
So my two questions:
- Tressel is not OSU football, and Tressel is not the proprietor of OSU football. So on one level, the NCAA’s level, he doesn’t matter — at all. He is an instrument, an employee, of an institution. I’m very skeptical about all this ‘punishment’ of Tressel, followed by (without so much as a semi-colon) statements by Smith that he was coach for life or something. Well, OSU is in the witness box, here; Tressel merely implicates OSU. He’s a sideshow. This is an institutional meltdown, no less than if a corporation publishes a phony 10-K. Sure, blame the CFO, but the plaintiff’s bar wants to know why the CEO hired that CFO. What am I missing?
- I read (and can hardly believe) that Tressel played potentially ineligible players knowingly. First he forgot to tell people what was going on, then he forgot that he was supposed to tell people the truth. So everyone is talking about vacating the entire season’s wins. If they are right, how on earth is OSU’s ‘punishment’ of Tressel supposed to mollify the NCAA? They take a month of pay, and two weeks of the season, when they’re playing Muskingum or Oberlin or somebody. Either OSU is dreaming, or the innertubes are overstating the gravity of this situation. The punishments do not align. What am I missing?
We play tackle football, most of the time.
by Bellanca on Mar 9, 2011 7:30 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
The main thing you're missing...
Is the NCAA’s reaction. I don’t know that Tressel being forced out isn’t still an option if tOSU can use him as a bargaining chip with the penalty department of the NCAA. Like you said, Gee stood by his man, and Tressel basically claimed he was trying to do the right thing, rather than admitting to doing intentionally the wrong thing.
Moving on to opinion, the way this has been handled stinks like “Lack of institutional control” to me. I don’t think they’ll get a USC-level sentence out of it, but they’re going to get thumped for sure.
by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Mar 9, 2011 7:40 PM CST up reply actions
Most likely the school would have to actually fire him...
as the NCAA can’t force a literal resignation, but they can issue a show cause penalty which would essentially require OSU or anyone who wants to employ him in any NCAA regulated job within a specified timeframe to justify it to the NCAA and accept whatever sanctions they elect to hand down on said program.
I don't mean the NCAA dictates from on high the OSU personnel policy.
I mean it’s one of those discussions outside the conference room where the work actually gets done, one of the NCAA guys say something along the lines of “Too bad you stuck by him, we probably would have only banned you from post-season for 1 year instead of 4”. And OSU looks real hard at what exactly Tressel is worth to them.
by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Mar 9, 2011 7:51 PM CST up reply actions
Run on sentence ftw
But seriously, I don’t think this is a show cause… but I don’t think Bruce Pearl’s is either as both had been pretty freaking clean until these incidents.
But it is the NCAA, so there is literally no telling… They could just as easily send sharks with lazer beams after Tressel as they could do nothing.
As long as it's punctuated properly...
There is no such thing as a run on sentence. Difficult to read? Absolutely. Irritating? Also absolutely. But as long as you don’t get all Kerouac and go stream of consciousness with no paragraphs in 300 pages you’re good.
by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Mar 9, 2011 7:53 PM CST up reply actions
Well, that's what I mean.
If the NCAA is going to crack them hard, what is OSU doing with these piddly penalties that they are imposing? Either OSU is delusional, or the interwebs are.
There must be something we don’t know that semi-exonerates Tressel. If not, and OSU is facing a heavy boot from the NCAA, Gene Smith et al are retards.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
I agree with you there.
Option 1. We don’t have all the dope.
Option 2. tOSU is being run by dopes.
Guess we’ll have to wait and see.
by Norm Parker's Amputated Toes on Mar 9, 2011 7:55 PM CST up reply actions
I'll take option 3
somewhere in the middle.
I HOPE this is all that will come of it, but I know there’s going to be more. Therefore, I shall be drinking heavily this weekend.
Wait, What?
Tressel is not OSU football and not the proprietor of OSU football? Then who is?
Surely you aren’t saying that it is the role of OSU’s AD to check Tressel’s email and make sure that he isn’t getting tips about the goings on of his players?
Tressel is in charge of what goes on with the football program and this mess is clearly his.
The NCAA will probably put down harder sanctions but I think Bama Hawkeye’s assesment on that front has been pretty spot on.
http://victorypolka.blogspot.com/
I'm sick about this
But KC is right. This is a mess that is wholely Tressel’s. I can’t think of any scenario that doesn’t play out at the very least like Bama Hawkeye’s assessment.
I emailed a friend last night that Tressel should be fired. Jim O’Brian was also fired for actions he took that resulted in massive violations. But given Tressel’s accomplishments and the quality of the program he’s created — I now think that an early retirement is a better option.
No player, coach, administrator, or fan is bigger than the school and its traditions. If it does come to that, we’ll move on but it will be with a heavy heart. The guy is an Ohio guy thru-and-thru.
Shit!
I don't think he should be fired
It is certainly his fault, and I wasn’t appreciative of the way Smith and Gee discussed that subject at the press conference (at least act like Tressel doesn’t own you), but I am not sold on this as a firing offense.
Yeah it was bad, but I just don’t see this as the end unless the NCAA comes down exceptionally hard after digging a little further into this.
If Tennessee can justify keeping Bruce Pearl, I certainly don’t begrudge OSU for keeping Tressel.
http://victorypolka.blogspot.com/
The University is the institution that failed, and institutions are responsible for the behavior of their staff. Your incredulity is very puzzling.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
Jeez
Tressel: Sorry, I forgot
NCAA: Oh, well……..tough shit, shoulda remembered (Hits him with USC like sentence)
^^^
is what i want to happen
by justsomehawkeyefan on Mar 9, 2011 7:32 PM CST reply actions
What I don't get is
this over use of the word Integrity when speaking of Tressel. I suspect when he was hired from Youngstown State (and the hot mess he left there) fOSU felt the need for a makeover of sorts and all kinds of subliminal and overt efforts were made by the sports marketing people there to achieve this.
It worked. There is a huge segment of the population here (I live in Cleveland) who can’t see what has happened. They believe he did nothing really wrong. Because he’s a man of “integrity.”
Or, worse, they see it and say, “Big deal. Delany is crooked. He will get us out of this” – actual quote. Or “He’s playing the confidentiality card. Classic Tressel. I love it” – another actual quote.
I also need to mention that there are many who are dissappointed and want him gone.
It's so sad how a family can be torn apart by something as simple as a pack of wild dogs.
by FiveSecondRuleChef on Mar 9, 2011 7:54 PM CST reply actions
Oh no . . . .
Don’t mention “integrity”! Didn’t you read the comments above? No one here wants to talk about integrity. They want to disect this particular incident piece by piece, but never elude to the bigger issue that one of the most promenant and successful college football programs in the country is being run by someone who has shown some significant character flaws, or the EVEN BIGGER ISSUE that the people in charge of the University are seemingly okay with it.
Shame on you.
by Disinterested Par-tay on Mar 10, 2011 8:20 AM CST up reply actions
Listen Jackass
We get it. You don’t like Ohio State. Good for you.
I’m not thrilled with how the Administration (Gee and Smith) reacted during the press conference. A tone of gravity would have been the appropriate response when asked about Tressel’s future. But as an alumnus and as a home-sick Ohioan, I can say on the whole I’m very proud of Ohio State’s integrity. Since the Jim O’Brian mess our Athletic Department has stepped up efforts as far as NCAA compliance. I suspect that every single violation since then has been self-reported. (AS WAS EVERY ASPECT OF THIS TATTOO-GATE SHIT-STORM.)
You want to talk about Maurice Clarett. Fine. Tressel was fresh out of Div I-AA at the time and probably wasn’t ready to deal with a prima donna of that caliber. He could have used some oversight from the Athletic Dept the first couple of years.
Troy Smith. Guess what. That’s an extension of the Maurice Clarett problem. Troy loaned his cell phone to Clarett when he was still on the team (who subsequently ran up a $500 tab). Troy’s summer employer offered to cover the bill for him (definitely a violation). At the time, I bet the only thing going thru Smith’s mind was that he finally found a way to stop the calls from debt collectors. He served his suspension and returned the money.
But inspite of all the crap that resulted from Clarett, Tressel has never abandoned the guy. Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I believe he spoke at Clarett’s sentencing hearing (it might have been a letter to the judge). I’m sure that he made some phone calls on his behalf when he was being considered for Arena Football League. That is typical Tressel. He’s a guy who actually cares for his players. He’s the kind of coach that tells juniors when their smartest move is to declare early. And that’s why we Ohioans believe he is a man of integrity.
Also as an Ohio State grad, I admit Tressel’s integrity has taken a major hit in my mind. For me, the biggest aspect of this is his hypocrisy of admonishing the five players and asking for their “word” to return next year in order to play in the Sugar Bowl. All the while knowing that he himself was not being honest.
But that in know way implies that Ohio State is running a dirty program. In fact, I’d stake my life on it.
by NC_Buckeye on Mar 10, 2011 9:33 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
OSU fans outstrip Michigan fans for unpleasantness.
Which is really hard to do, considering that you have a bunch of state school grads in a dying state yakking about how they went to the Harvard of the Midwest. (This is like getting a date with Nicole Kidman of the Midwest. I guess, if dating Nicole Kidman is important to me, I would probably want to avoid the anexoric wanna-be from Sheboygan.)
Anyway, either we don’t know what is really going on here, or Tressel’s integrity, and that of OSU, is situational (i.e., phony). That’s just obvious.
So perhaps it’s time to call me a name and say I hate OSU.
BTW, my experience with these stories is that the close-lipped, lock-down-happy coaches usually have some information that changes the discussion.
We play tackle football, most of the time.
I would not stake your life on it.
I just thought I’d tell you that you don’t have to do that. I don’t want that on my conscience.
by OctaShields on Mar 10, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
Granted, it's hyperbole.
The whole staking my life on it.
Bellanca, no names. Have at the dog-pile. Enjoy it. It’ll be over soon enough. And BTW, I’m going to start using “Harvard of the Midwest”. I like that a lot.
Kind of off topic
But if Ohio St is forced to vacate all of their wins it’ll be a final kick in the balls to Michigan St fans. Now Sparty can claim the 2010 crown outright but still couldn’t say they went to a BCS bowl game.
by Jonathan Loesche on Mar 9, 2011 8:49 PM CST reply actions
ha
good points
Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Graham Filler on Mar 9, 2011 8:54 PM CST up reply actions
One also has to remember this: Schools, AD’s, fanbases, etc…they have different relationships everywhere. Remember the Detroit Free Press essentially going after the Michigan football program? I’m not sure the Columbus Dispatch would ever do that. People who live in Columbus, the AD, the president…they’re all protecting the hell out of Tressel right now. It’s the natural reaction for that fanbase and it’s leaders. Compare that to say, Texas Tech looking, praying for reasons to fire the very successful Mike Leach.
Off Tackle Empire
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
Reading the Texas Tech emails is surreal
especially when you consider how big football is in Texas, and how being even somewhat successful is good for the image of the university and the relationships with alumni.
Lesson learned:
Don’t be a pirate.
/Derek Bell “Operation Shutdown’d”
by OctaShields on Mar 10, 2011 12:06 AM CST up reply actions
I'd like to proclaim
That I am proud of the majority of Ohio State fans for settling on rationality here on Day 2. I agree with the majority of your opinions – I don’t begrudge your situation, but I appreciate the balancing of your desire to succeed on the field with your desire to have a program that you can take pride in and trust to not completely sell out in a situation like this where the writing seems to be on the wall.
As far as Tressel’s ultimate resolution, I think it’s smart to just wait and see. If this is an isolated incident (I have my doubts, but that’s for another discussion), then I think it wouldn’t be terrible to give him a second chance (after a fair punishment is meted out). I’d hate to see him thrown under the bus just in hopes of getting a lesser penalty. But if the situation becomes such that he’s gotta go, then that’s what should happen.
So, Tressel’s excuse is that he didn’t notify the NCAA because the Feds trump the NCAA. Fair point. Okay, so far, I can buy this. And if there’s no proof of wrongdoing, do you sit guys without anything other than a single email?
BS. Tressel knows selling rings is an improper benefit for an amateur athlete. He should have notified his compliance dept at the very least.
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
I think you missed...
…the part where Ted says he’s playing along. His point was, even if you take everything Tressel is saying at face value there is still no logical way to come away from this knowing he made a big mistake and deserves more punishment then OSU is dishing out.
This
I think some people are missing the point of his post… That something majorly wrong was done by Tressel no matter whether you believe his version or not.
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Mar 10, 2011 9:54 AM CST up reply actions
Maybe this was a poorly worded post
But my point was that Tressel’s logic train doesn’t ever make it to the station for me, and we are in agreement. If he gets an email that says ‘feds are investigating players’, yes of course that trumps any NCAA jurisdiction, but to sit on that information and not tell anyone was ridiculous, which is what Tressel did. He claimed a confidentiality rule, which might hold true when talking to the NCAA, but it doesn’t hold water becuase he should have immediately talked to the compliance office and the AD’s office.
With the 12th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Minnesota Vikings select...
So with that, there are only two logical conclusions that we can come to reagarding Tressel’s decision making in this matter.
1. He thought he was genuinely doing the right thing by not saying anything about players that he knew were violating NCAA rules, because it was part of an ongoing federal investigation…that the OSU legal department and AD Gene Smith didn’t need to be bothered about. didn’t want to lose 5 key players for a promising season.
2. Jim Tressel is no different than any other coach
/fixed
Ever Grateful. Ever True.
Questions I hope we get answers to
1) In the press conference Tressel was asked if he forwarded the emails on to anyone. He said yes, but was then cut off from providing any more detail. Who did he forward it to? Is it possible some one else (or multiple people) in the athletic department knew about this? Yet at the same press conference he said he didn’t tell anyone because he was scared for the players. huh?
2) Did Tressel talk to any of the players named in the emails? I tend to think he did based on the fact the lawyer advised him to tell the players not to call Rife and that Tressel said “I will keep pounding these kids hoping they grow up”. One of the reasons the NCAA allowed the 5 suspended players to play in the Sugar Bowl was because they weren’t properly educated on the rules.
3) In the last email Tressel said “our rings arrive this week for 2009 Big Ten….any names from our last discussion?? I would like to hold some collateral if you know what I mean…” What does he mean by that? Does he have some type of confirmation that the players did sell stuff and he wants to keep the rings from those specific players for a time?
All very good questions
that in all likelihood we will never know the answers to
"I shoot, I score. He shoots, I score." - Dan Gable
by ClaybornSmash on Mar 10, 2011 9:56 AM CST up reply actions
The penalty is...
Tressel’s penalty, imposed by OSU, is that he has to sit out the Akron and Toledo games, so he’s not exactly missing bangin’ with the Badgers in terms of the degree of difficulty involved for his team.
Separately have you ever seen a university president who is more of an ass than Gordon Gee? What an incredibly inappropriate time for comedy; thanks folks be sure to tip your waiters and waitresses and drive home safely, I’m here all week.
I think the NCAA is going to come down on the Senator bigtime. I’m thinking five game suspension for him and they uphold the five games for the rest of the “tattoogate” players. Even with this kind of penalty no one will miss a minute of conference play which is a pity.

by 




























