(This may count as two posts too many about aggregate Sangarin rankings, but I did promise a Big 12/Big Ten comparison, so here it is.)
Yes it was. In each of the past four seasons, and 9/13 years in the BCS era, the Big Twelve has ranked higher than the Big Ten. How conference re-alignment will affect this remains to be seen.
Conference Rank (Sagarin by Central Mean)
|
Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
|
Big 12 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
|
Big Ten |
2 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
Contrary to the overall strength of conference, Nebraska's conference slate will be more difficult in its new league. This is due the distribution of teams in each conference. The Big Ten is relatively balanced. The Big 12 was not.
A few notes on the graph below:
Here is a comparison of Nebraska's old and New Division foes using the Sagarin 6 year rolling average rank (which represents a programs sustained success (or lack there of) over time).
What does this mean for Nebraska if anything?
It means that Nebraska is walking into a more competitive division. While they may deserve to be considered as favorites in their new division, their road has gotten harder (even more so when you consider the cross divisional opponents Nebraska faces this year: Penn State (protected cross over), Ohio State, and Wisconsin).
Whether or not Nebraska can be dominant in its new home remains speculative, but they can perhaps expect a tougher grind through the season regardless of projected outcomes.
Lastly, I'll leave you with a look at the Big 12 that was, for any who may be interested. Here is the Sagarin 6 year rolling average graph.
There are 7 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.