[ed note: Hoegher has these great posts on all of teams in the fanshots. We should be better at front-paging them... so here you go. -jc]
Getting this out early, because I've learned enough to know my weekdays will fill up fast.
NOTE: All of the numbers and figures that follow are based on my ratings system, which is derived from scoring data going back to 1930. For more explanation, see my primer here: [LINK]
Data gathered from the wonderful resources provided by Sports-Reference, James Howell, cfbstats.com, and Phil Steele.
PAST PERFORMANCES OF VARYING QUALITY
Nebraska - Historical Overall Ratings
Nebraska - Historical Offense & Defense
Nebraska - Historical Win% & "Luck"
[brief statement on nothing in particular]
"BEST" and "WORST" (since 1930, 9953 total teams)
Rk | Year | Team | Adj Rk | Res Rk | Conf | Record | Adj Off | Yr Rk | Adj Def | Yr Rk | Luck | Yr Rk | SOS | Yr Rk | N.C. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 1971 | Nebraska | 28 | 19 | Big8 | 13-0 | 2.14 | 2 | 0.33 | 1 | 8% | 25 | 0.29 | 22 | Y |
16 | 1995 | Nebraska | 23 | 47 | Big8 | 12-0 | 2.20 | 1 | 0.49 | 2 | 5% | 29 | 0.18 | 25 | Y |
22 | 1980 | Nebraska | 8 | 579 | Big8 | 10-2 | 2.19 | 1 | 0.37 | 3 | -9% | 117 | 0.37 | 13 | |
62 | 1972 | Nebraska | 17 | 658 | Big8 | 9-2-1 | 2.12 | 2 | 0.31 | 3 | -15% | 121 | 0.33 | 19 | |
70 | 1982 | Nebraska | 48 | 248 | Big8 | 12-1 | 2.02 | 1 | 0.53 | 7 | 1% | 45 | 0.21 | 34 |
1971 Nebraska (Coach - Bob Devaney)
Conf | Record | Luck (wins) | rk | Adj Off | rk | Adj Def | rk | Adj Eff | rk | Adj Marg | rk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Big8 | 13-0 | +1.0 | 25 | 2.14 | 2 | 0.33 | 1 | 0.87 | 1 | 1.81 | 1 |
Total Teams | Rating | rk | Opp-O | rk | Opp-D | rk | SOS | rk | Variance | rk | |
129 | 1.64 | 1 | 1.22 | 14 | 0.88 | 23 | 0.29 | 22 | 0.39 | 25 |
Gm | Wk | Date | H/V | Opponent | FCS | Record | Opp Rk | Off Rk | Def Rk | PF | PA | OT | W/L | W-Lk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Sep-11 | H | Oregon | ~ | 5-6 | 47 | 33 | 77 | 34 | 7 | ~ | W | 99% |
2 | 2 | Sep-18 | H | Minnesota | ~ | 4-7 | 67 | 53 | 82 | 35 | 7 | ~ | W | 99% |
3 | 3 | Sep-25 | H | TexasAM | ~ | 5-6 | 92 | 106 | 70 | 34 | 7 | ~ | W | 99% |
4 | 4 | Oct-02 | H | UtahState | ~ | 8-3 | 36 | 51 | 32 | 42 | 6 | ~ | W | 99% |
5 | 5 | Oct-09 | V | Missouri | ~ | 1-10 | 117 | 124 | 69 | 36 | 0 | ~ | W | 99% |
6 | 6 | Oct-16 | H | Kansas | ~ | 4-7 | 69 | 82 | 50 | 55 | 0 | ~ | W | 99% |
7 | 7 | Oct-23 | V | OklahomaState | ~ | 4-6-1 | 80 | 70 | 78 | 41 | 13 | ~ | W | 99% |
8 | 8 | Oct-30 | H | Colorado | ~ | 10-2 | 10 | 5 | 25 | 31 | 7 | ~ | W | 92% |
9 | 9 | Nov-06 | H | IowaState | ~ | 8-4 | 27 | 20 | 45 | 37 | 0 | ~ | W | 99% |
10 | 10 | Nov-13 | V | KansasState | ~ | 5-6 | 46 | 36 | 74 | 44 | 17 | ~ | W | 99% |
11 | 12 | Nov-25 | V | Oklahoma | ~ | 11-1 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 35 | 31 | ~ | W | 55% |
12 | 13 | Dec-04 | V | Hawaii | ~ | 7-4 | 57 | 65 | 64 | 45 | 3 | ~ | W | 99% |
13 | 20 | Jan-01 | N | Alabama | ~ | 11-1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 6 | ~ | W | 63% |
Trying to split hairs between 1995 Nebraska and 1971 Nebraska is going to be pretty much pointless. They are both great teams that played a largely weak schedule, but came out on top against their best opponents when given the chance. 1995 Nebraska had a better offense, 1971 Nebraska had a better defense. Both of them also beat a middling Big Ten team along the way, so this retrospective is even semi-relevant for our beloved conference of mediocrity.
What I'd like to focus on instead is that stunning period of success that Nebraska had between 1969 and 1997. During that period, Nebraska never lost more than three games (their worst record was 9-3-1 in 1976) and won 10+ games 17 times. That is a period of success and consistency that is unmatched by any other team. Alabama can't match that, Michigan can't match that, USC can't match that, no one can match that (at least, not for three continuous decades).
And yet, between 1972 and 1993, Nebraska has a total of zero national titles. Nebraska was my top-rated team every year from 1980-1984 except one (they ranked 2nd in 1981 behind Penn State, who they played and lost), and still managed to come out with zero national titles in that span. Losing games to the like of Syracuse (6-5 in 1984) will do that to you.
Rk | Year | Team | Adj Rk | Res Rk | Conf | Record | Adj Off | Yr Rk | Adj Def | Yr Rk | Luck | Yr Rk | SOS | Yr Rk | N.C. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8275 | 1944 | Nebraska | 8166 | 8377 | Big6 | 2-6 | 0.66 | 72 | 1.43 | 79 | 4% | 35 | 0.26 | 32 | |
8326 | 1942 | Nebraska | 8380 | 8096 | Big6 | 3-7 | 0.38 | 116 | 1.08 | 86 | 4% | 40 | -0.13 | 82 | |
8729 | 1951 | Nebraska | 8445 | 9090 | Big7 | 1-8-1 | 0.58 | 103 | 1.21 | 97 | 0% | 57 | 0.17 | 52 | |
8942 | 1957 | Nebraska | 8939 | 8875 | Big7 | 1-9 | 0.49 | 109 | 1.25 | 91 | -1% | 63 | 0.28 | 35 | |
9278 | 1943 | Nebraska | 9303 | 9139 | Big6 | 2-6 | 0.64 | 57 | 2.13 | 73 | 11% | 5 | -0.29 | 58 |
1943 Nebraska (Coach - Adolph Lewandowski)
Conf | Record | Luck (wins) | rk | Adj Off | rk | Adj Def | rk | Adj Eff | rk | Adj Marg | rk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Big6 | 2-6 | +0.9 | 5 | 0.64 | 57 | 2.13 | 73 | 0.23 | 69 | -1.49 | 72 |
Total Teams | Rating | rk | Opp-O | rk | Opp-D | rk | SOS | rk | Variance | rk | |
77 | -1.28 | 71 | 0.83 | 66 | 1.15 | 57 | -0.29 | 58 | 0.85 | 50 |
Gm | Wk | Date | H/V | Opponent | FCS | Record | Opp Rk | Off Rk | Def Rk | PF | PA | OT | W/L | W-Lk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | Oct-02 | V | Minnesota | ~ | 5-4 | 41 | 32 | 53 | 0 | 54 | ~ | L | 1% |
2 | 5 | Oct-09 | H | Indiana | ~ | 4-4-2 | 30 | 38 | 24 | 13 | 54 | ~ | L | 1% |
3 | 6 | Oct-16 | V | IowaState | ~ | 4-4 | 40 | 45 | 40 | 6 | 27 | ~ | L | 1% |
4 | 7 | Oct-23 | H | Kansas | ~ | 4-5-1 | 53 | 67 | 38 | 7 | 6 | ~ | W | 13% |
5 | 8 | Oct-30 | V | Missouri | ~ | 3-5 | 52 | 39 | 58 | 20 | 54 | ~ | L | 4% |
6 | 9 | Nov-06 | V | KansasState | ~ | 1-7 | 77 | 74 | 77 | 13 | 7 | ~ | W | 72% |
7 | 11 | Nov-20 | H | Iowa | ~ | 1-6-1 | 56 | 62 | 50 | 13 | 33 | ~ | L | 18% |
8 | 12 | Nov-27 | H | Oklahoma | ~ | 7-2 | 34 | 30 | 35 | 7 | 26 | ~ | L | 1% |
In 1943, Nebraska played two teams with a winning record (5-4 Minnesota and 7-2 Oklahoma). They got outscored 80-7 by those teams. They lost by 20 pts (at home!) to a 1-6-1 Iowa team. They lost by 40 pts to Indiana (granted this was the era where Indiana was decent, but this is still Indiana). Their coach was named Adolph, which is made all the worst by being 1943.
And despite that standard of suck-itude set, they still beat Kansas because Kansas.
FUTURE PROJECTIONS OF SUSPECT VALIDITY
Nebraska Proj Rk - 39 (out of 129)
Off Ret St - 5 (1 QB)
Def Ret St - 6
Conf | Prj Rec | Conf | Adj Off | rk | Adj Def | rk | SOS | rk | C-SOS | rk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B10 | 8-4 | 5-3 | 1.18 | 36 | 0.84 | 38 | 0.06 | 59 | 0.19 | 60 |
Gm | Wk | Date | H/V | Opponent | Prj Rk | Prj Off | Prj Def | W-Lk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Aug-30 | H | FloridaAtlantic | 108 | 118 | 80 | 97% |
2 | 2 | Sep-06 | H | McNeeseState | 126 | ~ | ~ | 99% |
3 | 3 | Sep-13 | V | FresnoState | 61 | 40 | 81 | 65% |
4 | 4 | Sep-20 | H | Miami | 38 | 23 | 52 | 59% |
5 | 5 | Sep-27 | H | Illinois | 68 | 75 | 60 | 84% |
6 | 6 | Oct-04 | V | MichiganState | 20 | 45 | 7 | 26% |
7 | 8 | Oct-18 | V | Northwestern | 51 | 55 | 51 | 55% |
8 | 9 | Oct-25 | H | Rutgers | 56 | 69 | 39 | 75% |
9 | 10 | Nov-01 | H | Purdue | 101 | 101 | 97 | 96% |
10 | 12 | Nov-15 | V | Wisconsin | 12 | 16 | 20 | 19% |
11 | 13 | Nov-22 | H | Minnesota | 73 | 99 | 47 | 86% |
12 | 14 | Nov-29 | V | Iowa | 41 | 61 | 22 | 41% |
13 | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
14 | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Nebraska 2014 Profile (old projections)
Hoegher's Biased Perspective
As the prophecies have foretold, until the mountains have turned to dust and the seas have dried to sand and bones, the time of PeLLLLini shall remain.
It's really a remarkable streak, isn't it? I thought for sure it would end last year, but Hail Mary's and Georgia injury conspired to keep the legend alive. To see that my Excel sheets have whirred and clicked to spit out an 8-4 prediction for Nebraska? Oh, it warms my heart and tickles my [CENSORED]. Good news though! 8-4 regular season means a bowl winning streak!
Question for the masses: assume PeLLLLini is real and will continue from time to eternity so long as Fauxlini has an active target. How long could he keep this going before he's fired? I have to assume that at some point it would get to be too much for the administration to handle, but when is that?
Talk Big Ten football with Off Tackle Empire